[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH0uvoh76QH8OjBfrs_nRYHEirwDb+=hxbvJTRJQhY5DZKvLEw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 13:40:30 -0800
From: Howard Chu <howardchu95@...il.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, namhyung@...nel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, mark.rutland@....com, james.clark@...aro.org,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
kan.liang@...ux.intel.com, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 09/10] perf record --off-cpu: Dump the remaining
samples in BPF's stack trace map
Hello Ian,
On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 10:07 AM Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 12:41 PM Howard Chu <howardchu95@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Dump the remaining samples, as if it is dumping a direct sample.
> >
> > Put the stack trace, tid, off-cpu time and cgroup id into the raw_data
> > section, just like a direct off-cpu sample coming from BPF's
> > bpf_perf_event_output().
> >
> > This ensures that evsel__parse_sample() correctly parses both direct
> > samples and accumulated samples.
>
> Nice, hopefully this should mean we can get rid of the logic holding
> all threads live for the sake of off-CPU, as off-CPU events were being
> "sampled" after threads had terminated
> (symbol_conf.keep_exited_threads). An example of this logic is:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git/tree/tools/perf/builtin-report.c?h=perf-tools-next#n1484
> Perhaps there is a follow up to dump exiting processes with a BPF
> program on `tp/sched/sched_process_exit`. If the exited process is
> already "dumped" then its map entry can be removed which may lower
> overhead if off-CPU is running for a long time system wide.
Thanks for the advice, that's actually a great idea. IIUC, when a task
exits, dump its off-cpu time regardless of the threshold, and delete
the map entry to save space for other tasks.
>
>
> > Suggested-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Howard Chu <howardchu95@...il.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
>
> Thanks,
> Ian
>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/util/bpf_off_cpu.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_off_cpu.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_off_cpu.c
> > index cfe5b17393e9..f1be354e2fe7 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_off_cpu.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_off_cpu.c
> > @@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ union off_cpu_data {
> > u64 array[1024 / sizeof(u64)];
> > };
> >
> > +u64 off_cpu_raw[MAX_STACKS + 5];
> > +
> > static int off_cpu_config(struct evlist *evlist)
> > {
> > char off_cpu_event[64];
> > @@ -61,6 +63,9 @@ static int off_cpu_config(struct evlist *evlist)
> > static void off_cpu_start(void *arg)
> > {
> > struct evlist *evlist = arg;
> > + struct evsel *evsel;
> > + struct perf_cpu pcpu;
> > + int i, err;
> >
> > /* update task filter for the given workload */
> > if (skel->rodata->has_task && skel->rodata->uses_tgid &&
> > @@ -304,6 +309,7 @@ int off_cpu_write(struct perf_session *session)
> > {
> > int bytes = 0, size;
> > int fd, stack;
> > + u32 raw_size;
> > u64 sample_type, val, sid = 0;
> > struct evsel *evsel;
> > struct perf_data_file *file = &session->data->file;
> > @@ -343,46 +349,54 @@ int off_cpu_write(struct perf_session *session)
> >
> > while (!bpf_map_get_next_key(fd, &prev, &key)) {
> > int n = 1; /* start from perf_event_header */
> > - int ip_pos = -1;
> >
> > bpf_map_lookup_elem(fd, &key, &val);
> >
> > + /* zero-fill some of the fields, will be overwritten by raw_data when parsing */
> > if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_IDENTIFIER)
> > data.array[n++] = sid;
> > - if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_IP) {
> > - ip_pos = n;
> > + if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_IP)
> > data.array[n++] = 0; /* will be updated */
> > - }
> > if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_TID)
> > - data.array[n++] = (u64)key.pid << 32 | key.tgid;
> > + data.array[n++] = 0;
> > if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_TIME)
> > data.array[n++] = tstamp;
> > - if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_ID)
> > - data.array[n++] = sid;
> > if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_CPU)
> > data.array[n++] = 0;
> > if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD)
> > - data.array[n++] = val;
> > - if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN) {
> > - int len = 0;
> > -
> > - /* data.array[n] is callchain->nr (updated later) */
> > - data.array[n + 1] = PERF_CONTEXT_USER;
> > - data.array[n + 2] = 0;
> > -
> > - bpf_map_lookup_elem(stack, &key.stack_id, &data.array[n + 2]);
> > - while (data.array[n + 2 + len])
> > + data.array[n++] = 0;
> > + if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_RAW) {
> > + /*
> > + * [ size ][ data ]
> > + * [ data ]
> > + * [ data ]
> > + * [ data ]
> > + * [ data ][ empty]
> > + */
> > + int len = 0, i = 0;
> > + void *raw_data = (void *)data.array + n * sizeof(u64);
> > +
> > + off_cpu_raw[i++] = (u64)key.pid << 32 | key.tgid;
> > + off_cpu_raw[i++] = val;
> > +
> > + /* off_cpu_raw[i] is callchain->nr (updated later) */
> > + off_cpu_raw[i + 1] = PERF_CONTEXT_USER;
> > + off_cpu_raw[i + 2] = 0;
> > +
> > + bpf_map_lookup_elem(stack, &key.stack_id, &off_cpu_raw[i + 2]);
> > + while (off_cpu_raw[i + 2 + len])
> > len++;
> >
> > - /* update length of callchain */
> > - data.array[n] = len + 1;
> > + off_cpu_raw[i] = len + 1;
> > + i += len + 2;
> > +
> > + off_cpu_raw[i++] = key.cgroup_id;
> >
> > - /* update sample ip with the first callchain entry */
> > - if (ip_pos >= 0)
> > - data.array[ip_pos] = data.array[n + 2];
> > + raw_size = i * sizeof(u64) + sizeof(u32); /* 4 bytes for alignment */
> > + memcpy(raw_data, &raw_size, sizeof(raw_size));
> > + memcpy(raw_data + sizeof(u32), off_cpu_raw, i * sizeof(u64));
> >
> > - /* calculate sample callchain data array length */
> > - n += len + 2;
> > + n += i + 1;
> > }
> > if (sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_CGROUP)
> > data.array[n++] = key.cgroup_id;
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >
Thanks,
Howard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists