| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <0dae1cea420bd335be591e4b1be3d07c@mainlining.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 19:49:18 +0100
From: barnabas.czeman@...nlining.org
To: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@...aro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio
<konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Linus Walleij
<linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>, Thara Gopinath
<thara.gopinath@...il.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Daniel
Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Lukasz
Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon
<will@...nel.org>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, Srinivas Kandagatla
<srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
Otto Pflüger <otto.pflueger@...cue.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/10] arm64: dts: qcom: Add initial support for
MSM8917
On 2024-11-12 18:27, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 04:49:38PM +0100, Barnabás Czémán wrote:
>> From: Otto Pflüger <otto.pflueger@...cue.de>
>>
>> Add initial support for MSM8917 SoC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Otto Pflüger <otto.pflueger@...cue.de>
>> [reword commit, rebase, fix schema errors]
>> Signed-off-by: Barnabás Czémán <barnabas.czeman@...nlining.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8917.dtsi | 1974
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 1974 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8917.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8917.dtsi
>> new file mode 100644
>> index
>> 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cf0a0eec1141e11faca0ee9705d6348ab32a0f50
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8917.dtsi
>> @@ -0,0 +1,1974 @@
>> [...]
>> + domain-idle-states {
>> + cluster_sleep_0: cluster-sleep-0 {
>> + compatible = "domain-idle-state";
>> + arm,psci-suspend-param = <0x41000023>;
>> + entry-latency-us = <700>;
>> + exit-latency-us = <650>;
>> + min-residency-us = <1972>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + cluster_sleep_1: cluster-sleep-1 {
>> + compatible = "domain-idle-state";
>> + arm,psci-suspend-param = <0x41000043>;
>> + entry-latency-us = <240>;
>> + exit-latency-us = <280>;
>> + min-residency-us = <806>;
>> + };
>
> I think my comment here is still open:
>
> This is strange, the deeper sleep state has lower timings than the
> previous one?
I was reordering based on Konrad comments when i have renamed the nodes
maybe it is not correct then.
I am searching for how to validate these levels, i have find these
https://git.codelinaro.org/clo/la/kernel/msm-4.9/-/blob/LA.UM.10.6.2.c26-01500-89xx.0/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8917-pm.dtsi#L45-91
Do you know where can i find psci-suspend-param-s? Should I also add wfi
level?
>
>> +
>> + cluster_sleep_2: cluster-sleep-2 {
>> + compatible = "domain-idle-state";
>> + arm,psci-suspend-param = <0x41000053>;
>> + entry-latency-us = <700>;
>> + exit-latency-us = <1000>;
>> + min-residency-us = <6500>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> [...]
>> + restart@...000 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,pshold";
>> + reg = <0x004ab000 0x4>;
>> + };
>
> This one too:
>
> You have PSCI for shutting down, do you actually need this?
>
>> +
>> + tlmm: pinctrl@...0000 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,msm8917-pinctrl";
>> + reg = <0x01000000 0x300000>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 208 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> + gpio-controller;
>> + gpio-ranges = <&tlmm 0 0 134>;
>> + #gpio-cells = <2>;
>> + interrupt-controller;
>> + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
>> +
>> [...]
>> + sdc1_clk_on: sdc1-clk-on-state {
>> + pins = "sdc1_clk";
>> + bias-disable;
>> + drive-strength = <16>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + sdc1_clk_off: sdc1-clk-off-state {
>> + pins = "sdc1_clk";
>> + bias-disable;
>> + drive-strength = <2>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + sdc1_cmd_on: sdc1-cmd-on-state {
>> + pins = "sdc1_cmd";
>> + bias-disable;
>> + drive-strength = <10>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + sdc1_cmd_off: sdc1-cmd-off-state {
>> + pins = "sdc1_cmd";
>> + bias-disable;
>> + drive-strength = <2>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + sdc1_data_on: sdc1-data-on-state {
>> + pins = "sdc1_data";
>> + bias-pull-up;
>> + drive-strength = <10>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + sdc1_data_off: sdc1-data-off-state {
>> + pins = "sdc1_data";
>> + bias-pull-up;
>> + drive-strength = <2>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + sdc1_rclk_on: sdc1-rclk-on-state {
>> + pins = "sdc1_rclk";
>> + bias-pull-down;
>> + };
>> +
>> + sdc1_rclk_off: sdc1-rclk-off-state {
>> + pins = "sdc1_rclk";
>> + bias-pull-down;
>> + };
>> +
>> + sdc2_clk_on: sdc2-clk-on-state {
>> + pins = "sdc2_clk";
>> + drive-strength = <16>;
>> + bias-disable;
>> + };
>> +
>> + sdc2_clk_off: sdc2-clk-off-state {
>> + pins = "sdc2_clk";
>> + bias-disable;
>> + drive-strength = <2>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + sdc2_cmd_on: sdc2-cmd-on-state {
>> + pins = "sdc2_cmd";
>> + bias-pull-up;
>> + drive-strength = <10>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + sdc2_cmd_off: sdc2-cmd-off-state {
>> + pins = "sdc2_cmd";
>> + bias-pull-up;
>> + drive-strength = <2>;
>> + };
>
> These are not referenced anywhere? Not here in the sdhc_X nodes, and
> also not in your msm8917-xiaomi-riva.dts. Would also recommend
> consolidating these to a single node like in msm8916.dtsi, see commit
> c943e4c58b2f ("arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Consolidate SDC pinctrl").
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=c943e4c58b2ffb0dcd497f8b12f284f5e8fc477e
>
>> +
>> + sdc2_cd_on: cd-on-state {
>> + pins = "gpio67";
>> + function = "gpio";
>> + drive-strength = <2>;
>> + bias-pull-up;
>> + };
>> +
>> + sdc2_cd_off: cd-off-state {
>> + pins = "gpio67";
>> + function = "gpio";
>> + drive-strength = <2>;
>> + bias-disable;
>> + };
>
> It does not make sense to have different on/off states for the card
> detect (CD) pin of the SD card. It needs to work even when the SD card
> is suspended so we can detect insertions/removals. Also should be
> placed
> in the board-specific DT part.
>
> See commit dfbda20dabaa ("arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Fix SD card
> detect pinctrl").
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=dfbda20dabaa1f284abd550035db5887384c8e4c
>
>
>> +
>> + sdc2_data_on: sdc2-data-on-state {
>> + pins = "sdc2_data";
>> + bias-pull-up;
>> + drive-strength = <10>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + sdc2_data_off: sdc2-data-off-state {
>> + pins = "sdc2_data";
>> + bias-pull-up;
>> + drive-strength = <2>;
>> + };
>> +
>> [...]
>> + blsp1_i2c4: i2c@...8000 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,i2c-qup-v2.2.1";
>> + reg = <0x078b8000 0x500>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 98 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_BLSP1_QUP4_I2C_APPS_CLK>,
>> + <&gcc GCC_BLSP1_AHB_CLK>;
>> + clock-names = "core", "iface";
>> + dmas = <&blsp1_dma 10>, <&blsp1_dma 11>;
>> + dma-names = "tx", "rx";
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&blsp1_i2c4_default>;
>> + pinctrl-1 = <&blsp1_i2c4_sleep>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default", "sleep";
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> + status = "disabled";
>> + };
>> +
>> + blsp2_i2c5: i2c@...5000 {
>
> This is actually blsp2_i2c1 if you look at the clock name below:
>
>> + compatible = "qcom,i2c-qup-v2.2.1";
>> + reg = <0x07af5000 0x600>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 299 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_BLSP2_QUP1_I2C_APPS_CLK>,
>
> here ^
>
> But I realize now that the pinctrl functions are consecutively numbered
> without the BLSP number. Sorry for the confusion.
>
> Basically:
> - blsp1_i2c2 == blsp_i2c2
> - blsp2_i2c1 == blsp_i2c5
>
> Looking at some other examples upstream I guess you can choose between
> one of the following options:
>
> 1. msm8974/msm8976/msm8996/msm8998: Use &blspX_i2cY labels for the
> i2c@
> node and pinctrl and only have the slightly confusing pinctrl
> function. E.g. this in msm8976.dtsi:
>
> /* 4 (not 6!) interfaces per QUP, BLSP2 indexes are numbered (n)+4
> */
> blsp2_i2c2_default: blsp2-i2c2-default-state {
> pins = "gpio22", "gpio23";
> function = "blsp_i2c6";
> drive-strength = <2>;
> bias-disable;
> };
>
> Note how blsp2_i2c2 == blsp_i2c6.
>
> 2. msm8994: Use &blspX_i2cY labels for the i2c@ node, but keep pinctrl
> named &i2cN_default. E.g. this in msm8994.dtsi:
>
> blsp2_i2c1: i2c@...63000 {
> /* ... */
> pinctrl-names = "default", "sleep";
> pinctrl-0 = <&i2c7_default>;
> pinctrl-1 = <&i2c7_sleep>;
> /* ... */
> };
>
> Note how blsp2_i2c1 == i2c7_default here.
>
> 3. msm8953: Use &i2c_N labels everywhere like on downstream. E.g. this
> in msm8953.dtsi. This is pretty much what you had originally:
>
> i2c_5: i2c@...5000 {
> /* ... */
> pinctrl-names = "default", "sleep";
> pinctrl-0 = <&i2c_5_default>;
> pinctrl-1 = <&i2c_5_sleep>;
> /* ... */
> };
>
> All of these are fine for me. Feel free to pick the one you prefer. But
> let's not introduce a new confusing variant of this. :-)
>
> Thanks,
> Stephan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists