[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fe7a61b3-627f-4e60-9bba-28a4d40d1ec8@linux.dev>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 16:25:52 -0800
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
To: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@...nel.org>,
Geliang Tang <geliang@...nel.org>
Cc: mptcp@...ts.linux.dev, Mat Martineau <martineau@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next/net 1/5] bpf: Register mptcp common kfunc set
On 11/8/24 7:52 AM, Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) wrote:
> From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@...inos.cn>
>
> MPTCP helper mptcp_sk() is used to convert struct sock to mptcp_sock.
> Helpers mptcp_subflow_ctx() and mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock() are used to
> convert between struct mptcp_subflow_context and sock. They all will
> be used in MPTCP BPF programs too.
>
> This patch defines corresponding wrappers of them, and put the
> wrappers into mptcp common kfunc set and register the set with the
> flag BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC to let them accessible to all types of BPF
> programs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@...inos.cn>
> Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <martineau@...nel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@...nel.org>
> ---
> net/mptcp/bpf.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/bpf.c b/net/mptcp/bpf.c
> index 8a16672b94e2384f5263e1432296cbca1236bb30..6f96a5927fd371f8ea92cbf96c875edef9272b98 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/bpf.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/bpf.c
> @@ -29,8 +29,46 @@ static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_mptcp_fmodret_set = {
> .set = &bpf_mptcp_fmodret_ids,
> };
>
> +__bpf_kfunc_start_defs();
> +
> +__bpf_kfunc static struct mptcp_sock *bpf_mptcp_sk(struct sock *sk)
> +{
> + return mptcp_sk(sk);
> +}
> +
> +__bpf_kfunc static struct mptcp_subflow_context *
> +bpf_mptcp_subflow_ctx(const struct sock *sk)
> +{
> + return mptcp_subflow_ctx(sk);
This returns "struct mptcp_subflow_context *" without checking the sk is a mptcp
subflow or not...
> +}
> +
> +__bpf_kfunc static struct sock *
> +bpf_mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(const struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow)
> +{
> + return mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
...and then the "struct mptcp_subflow_context *" can be used by this kfunc here.
Is it really safe?
> +}
> +
> +__bpf_kfunc_end_defs();
> +
> +BTF_KFUNCS_START(bpf_mptcp_common_kfunc_ids)
> +BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_mptcp_sk)
> +BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_mptcp_subflow_ctx)
> +BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock)
All of them has no KF_TRUSTED_ARGS or KF_RCU, so the returned ptr is supposed to
be read-only? Why are they needed and why bpf_rdonly_cast (aka the bpf_core_cast
in libbpf) cannot be used?
pw-bot: cr
> +BTF_KFUNCS_END(bpf_mptcp_common_kfunc_ids)
> +
> +static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_mptcp_common_kfunc_set = {
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .set = &bpf_mptcp_common_kfunc_ids,
> +};
> +
> static int __init bpf_mptcp_kfunc_init(void)
> {
> - return register_btf_fmodret_id_set(&bpf_mptcp_fmodret_set);
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = register_btf_fmodret_id_set(&bpf_mptcp_fmodret_set);
> + ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC,
> + &bpf_mptcp_common_kfunc_set);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
> late_initcall(bpf_mptcp_kfunc_init);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists