[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAyq3SbVkRmUbeuaf8_HMsdug+roRxvQjw9nanD5W5JDfOmpfw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 15:16:46 +0800
From: Cheng Ming Lin <linchengming884@...il.com>
To: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
Cc: pratyush@...nel.org, mwalle@...nel.org, miquel.raynal@...tlin.com,
richard@....at, vigneshr@...com, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alvinzhou@...c.com.tw, leoyu@...c.com.tw,
Cheng Ming Lin <chengminglin@...c.com.tw>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: core: replace dummy buswidth from addr to data
Hi Tudor,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org> 於 2024年11月12日 週二 下午3:06寫道:
>
>
>
> On 11/12/24 6:45 AM, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 11/12/24 2:42 AM, Cheng Ming Lin wrote:
> >> Hi Tudor,
> >>
> >> Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org> 於 2024年11月11日 週一 下午6:18寫道:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 11/7/24 9:30 AM, Cheng Ming Lin wrote:
> >>>> From: Cheng Ming Lin <chengminglin@...c.com.tw>
> >>>>
> >>>> The default dummy cycle for Macronix SPI NOR flash in Octal Output
> >>>> Read Mode(1-1-8) is 20.
> >>>>
> >>>> Currently, the dummy buswidth is set according to the address bus width.
> >>>> In the 1-1-8 mode, this means the dummy buswidth is 1. When converting
> >>>> dummy cycles to bytes, this results in 20 x 1 / 8 = 2 bytes, causing the
> >>>> host to read data 4 cycles too early.
> >>>>
> >>>> Since the protocol data buswidth is always greater than or equal to the
> >>>> address buswidth. Setting the dummy buswidth to match the data buswidth
> >>>> increases the likelihood that the dummy cycle-to-byte conversion will be
> >>>> divisible, preventing the host from reading data prematurely.
> >>>
> >>> This is still very wrong and the `fix` is working just by chance.
> >>> Consider what happens when one requires 10 dummy cycles. BTW, does this
> >>> fix a real problem, or it's just a theoretical fix?
> >>
> >> In 1-1-8 mode, setting the dummy buswidth to match the data
> >> buswidth ensures a dummy buswidth of 8, which can accommodate
> >> all types of dummy cycles.
> >>
> >> This patch resolves a significant issue in 1-1-8 mode, as described above.
> >>
> >
> > shall we add a fixes tag then, and a cc to stable?
>
> I need a patch today if you want it integrated in the SPI NOR PR.
> Otherwise we'll queue one in the -rc phase.
Sure, so do I need to submit a second version of the patch
with the Fixes tag and cc it to stable?
Thanks,
Cheng Ming Lin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists