lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <09cfdd95-c566-4379-be17-2d5e0f0e8357@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 10:16:11 +0200
From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>,
 Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc: Sanket.Goswami@....com, linux-i3c@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] i3c: dw: Add support for AMDI0015 ACPI ID

Hi

On 11/8/24 9:33 AM, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:
> Add AMDI0015 _HID for Designware I3C driver so that the dw-i3c-master
> driver can be probed on AMD platforms.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>
> ---
>   drivers/i3c/master/dw-i3c-master.c | 7 +++++++
>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i3c/master/dw-i3c-master.c b/drivers/i3c/master/dw-i3c-master.c
> index 8d694672c110..1a7c300b6d45 100644
> --- a/drivers/i3c/master/dw-i3c-master.c
> +++ b/drivers/i3c/master/dw-i3c-master.c
> @@ -1748,12 +1748,19 @@ static const struct of_device_id dw_i3c_master_of_match[] = {
>   };
>   MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, dw_i3c_master_of_match);
>   
> +static const struct acpi_device_id amd_i3c_device_match[] = {
> +	{ "AMDI0015" },
> +	{ }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, amd_i3c_device_match);
> +
>   static struct platform_driver dw_i3c_driver = {
>   	.probe = dw_i3c_probe,
>   	.remove_new = dw_i3c_remove,
>   	.driver = {
>   		.name = "dw-i3c-master",
>   		.of_match_table = dw_i3c_master_of_match,
> +		.acpi_match_table = amd_i3c_device_match,
>   		.pm = &dw_i3c_pm_ops,
>   	},
>   };

Am I right this and patch 5/5 can be independent from rest of the series?

To me it looks these two patches enable bus communication and thus be 
useful without rest of the series while latter need more discussion 
(I'll have some notes coming) and Cc'ing linux-acpi.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ