linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ynl: samples: Fix the wrong format specifier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD4GDZyJYrWt4PPAb=9JEuv8m1QOKzTC+RF1kw7iaDTy+GGTBw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 09:50:03 +0000
From: Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>
To: Luo Yifan <luoyifan@...s.chinamobile.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ynl: samples: Fix the wrong format specifier

On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 at 08:39, Luo Yifan <luoyifan@...s.chinamobile.com> wrote:
>
> Make a minor change to eliminate a static checker warning. The type
> of s->ifc is unsigned int, so the correct format specifier should be
> %u instead of %d.

You should include netdev@...r.kernel.org on the recipient list and
the subject should name the target tree, so it should say [PATCH
net-next] unless it is a fix that you want to go to the net tree in
which case it would be [PATCH net].

That said, the patch looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>