[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241112103817.1654333-5-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 05:38:15 -0500
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: David Wang <00107082@....com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 5/5] proc/softirqs: replace seq_printf with seq_put_decimal_ull_width
From: David Wang <00107082@....com>
[ Upstream commit 84b9749a3a704dcc824a88aa8267247c801d51e4 ]
seq_printf is costy, on a system with n CPUs, reading /proc/softirqs
would yield 10*n decimal values, and the extra cost parsing format string
grows linearly with number of cpus. Replace seq_printf with
seq_put_decimal_ull_width have significant performance improvement.
On an 8CPUs system, reading /proc/softirqs show ~40% performance
gain with this patch.
Signed-off-by: David Wang <00107082@....com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
fs/proc/softirqs.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/softirqs.c b/fs/proc/softirqs.c
index 12901dcf57e2b..d8f4e7d54d002 100644
--- a/fs/proc/softirqs.c
+++ b/fs/proc/softirqs.c
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ static int show_softirqs(struct seq_file *p, void *v)
for (i = 0; i < NR_SOFTIRQS; i++) {
seq_printf(p, "%12s:", softirq_to_name[i]);
for_each_possible_cpu(j)
- seq_printf(p, " %10u", kstat_softirqs_cpu(i, j));
+ seq_put_decimal_ull_width(p, " ", kstat_softirqs_cpu(i, j), 10);
seq_putc(p, '\n');
}
return 0;
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists