[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aca5eab83da33e2accb16af45c36762671fc900c.camel@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 06:12:32 -0500
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Christian Brauner
<brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] fs: allow statmount to fetch the fs_subtype and
sb_source
On Tue, 2024-11-12 at 11:32 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 at 16:10, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Meta has some internal logging that scrapes /proc/self/mountinfo today.
> > I'd like to convert it to use listmount()/statmount(), so we can do a
> > better job of monitoring with containers. We're missing some fields
> > though. This patchset adds them.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
>
> When thinking of the naming for the unescaped options, I realized that
> maybe "source" is better than "sb_soure" which just adds redundant
> info. Just a thought, don't bother if you don't agree.
>
> Acked-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
>
I think sb_source fits better with the convention that the other fields
in the struct use. I say we stick with that.
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists