linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] x86/smp native_play_dead: Prefer cpuidle_play_dead() over mwait_play

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0ivAk1xrcJgiJnDWnL3GdijSdsuV4K_4ORjnsjPUVAEnA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 13:03:49 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Patryk Wlazlyn <patryk.wlazlyn@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, 
	rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, len.brown@...el.com, 
	artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] x86/smp native_play_dead: Prefer
 cpuidle_play_dead() over mwait_play_dead()

On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 12:47 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 01:29:08PM +0100, Patryk Wlazlyn wrote:
> > The generic implementation, based on cpuid leaf 0x5, for looking up the
> > mwait hint for the deepest cstate, depends on them to be continuous in
> > range [0, NUM_SUBSTATES-1]. While that is correct on most Intel x86
> > platforms, it is not architectural and may not result in reaching the
> > most optimized idle state on some of them.
> >
> > Prefer cpuidle_play_dead() over the generic mwait_play_dead() loop and
> > fallback to the later in case of missing enter_dead() handler.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Patryk Wlazlyn <patryk.wlazlyn@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> > index 44c40781bad6..721bb931181c 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> > @@ -1416,9 +1416,9 @@ void native_play_dead(void)
> >       play_dead_common();
> >       tboot_shutdown(TB_SHUTDOWN_WFS);
> >
> > -     mwait_play_dead();
> >       if (cpuidle_play_dead())
> > -             hlt_play_dead();
> > +             mwait_play_dead();
> > +     hlt_play_dead();
> >  }
>
> Yeah, I don't think so. we don't want to accidentally hit
> acpi_idle_play_dead().

Fair enough.

Then we are back to the original approach though:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20241029101507.7188-3-patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com/