[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <055703d7-1434-42fb-8048-add21a9bd44c@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 09:24:28 +0800
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Qiang Liu <liuq131@...natelecom.cn>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/compaction: fix the total_isolated in strict mode
On 2024/11/3 04:16, Qiang Liu wrote:
> If the last cycle reads bogus compound_order() and blockpfn > end_pfn occurs,
if blockpfn > end_pfn occurs, we will reset the blockpfn, right?
/*
* Be careful to not go outside of the pageblock.
*/
if (unlikely(blockpfn > end_pfn))
blockpfn = end_pfn;
So how this can happen?
> it is possible that total_isolated will be less than nr_scanned. In this case,
> strict mode should return 0, but the “if (strict && blockpfn < end_pfn)”
> statement cannot recognize this situation
>
> Signed-off-by: Qiang Liu <liuq131@...natelecom.cn>
> ---
> mm/compaction.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index a2b16b08cbbf..6009f5d1021a 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -699,7 +699,7 @@ static unsigned long isolate_freepages_block(struct compact_control *cc,
> * pages requested were isolated. If there were any failures, 0 is
> * returned and CMA will fail.
> */
> - if (strict && blockpfn < end_pfn)
> + if (strict && (blockpfn < end_pfn || total_isolated != nr_scanned))
> total_isolated = 0;
>
> cc->total_free_scanned += nr_scanned;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists