[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241112-muskel-furios-7a25e5794b0c@brauner>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 14:12:00 +0100
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>, Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>,
Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] fs: allow statmount to fetch the subtype and
devname
On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 11:24:45AM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 at 10:42, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 08:42:26AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
>
> > > It's error-prone and a pain to roll these yourself, and that would make
> >
> > As with most system calls.
>
> Also couldn't the kernel tree have a man2 directory, where all the
> syscall man pages could be maintained? I think it would very much
> make sense to update the man page together with the kernel API change.
I keep saying that over and over as well. IMHO, we should integrate the
system call manpages into the kernel tree. So fully agreed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists