[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZzTWkZJktDMlwQEW@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 16:40:49 +0000
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
To: Waiman Long <llong@...hat.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Koutny <mkoutny@...e.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Qais Yousef <qyousef@...alina.io>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
"Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>,
Aashish Sharma <shraash@...gle.com>,
Shin Kawamura <kawasin@...gle.com>,
Vineeth Remanan Pillai <vineeth@...byteword.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched/deadline: Correctly account for allocated
bandwidth during hotplug
On 13/11/24 11:06, Waiman Long wrote:
...
> This part can still cause a failure in one of test cases in my cpuset
> partition test script. In this particular case, the CPU to be offlined is an
> isolated CPU with scheduling disabled. As a result, total_bw is 0 and the
> __dl_overflow() test failed. Is there a way to skip the __dl_overflow() test
> for isolated CPUs? Can we use a null total_bw as a proxy for that?
Can you please share the repro script? Would like to check locally what
is going on.
Thanks!
Juri
Powered by blists - more mailing lists