[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241113191602.3541870-2-jeffxu@google.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 19:16:02 +0000
From: jeffxu@...omium.org
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
keescook@...omium.org,
jannh@...gle.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
adhemerval.zanella@...aro.org,
oleg@...hat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
jorgelo@...omium.org,
sroettger@...gle.com,
ojeda@...nel.org,
adobriyan@...il.com,
anna-maria@...utronix.de,
mark.rutland@....com,
linus.walleij@...aro.org,
Jason@...c4.com,
deller@....de,
rdunlap@...radead.org,
davem@...emloft.net,
hch@....de,
peterx@...hat.com,
hca@...ux.ibm.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com,
gerg@...nel.org,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
mingo@...nel.org,
ardb@...nel.org,
Liam.Howlett@...cle.com,
mhocko@...e.com,
42.hyeyoo@...il.com,
peterz@...radead.org,
ardb@...gle.com,
enh@...gle.com,
rientjes@...gle.com,
groeck@...omium.org,
lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/1] exec: seal system mappings
From: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...omium.org>
Seal vdso, vvar, sigpage, uprobes and vsyscall.
Those mappings are readonly or executable only, sealing can protect
them from ever changing or unmapped during the life time of the process.
For complete descriptions of memory sealing, please see mseal.rst [1].
System mappings such as vdso, vvar, and sigpage (for arm) are
generated by the kernel during program initialization, and are
sealed after creation.
Unlike the aforementioned mappings, the uprobe mapping is not
established during program startup. However, its lifetime is the same
as the process's lifetime [1]. It is sealed from creation.
The vdso, vvar, sigpage, and uprobe mappings all invoke the
_install_special_mapping() function. As no other mappings utilize this
function, it is logical to incorporate sealing logic within
_install_special_mapping(). This approach avoids the necessity of
modifying code across various architecture-specific implementations.
The vsyscall mapping, which has its own initialization function, is
sealed in the XONLY case, it seems to be the most common and secure
case of using vsyscall.
It is important to note that the CHECKPOINT_RESTORE feature (CRIU) may
alter the mapping of vdso, vvar, and sigpage during restore
operations. Consequently, this feature cannot be universally enabled
across all systems. To address this, a kernel configuration option has
been introduced to enable or disable this functionality.
[1] Documentation/userspace-api/mseal.rst
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CABi2SkU9BRUnqf70-nksuMCQ+yyiWjo3fM4XkRkL-NrCZxYAyg@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...omium.org>
---
.../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 10 +++++
arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_64.c | 9 ++++-
include/linux/mm.h | 12 ++++++
mm/mmap.c | 10 +++++
mm/mseal.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++
security/Kconfig | 11 ++++++
6 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
index e7bfe1bde49e..469a65b3cf50 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -1538,6 +1538,16 @@
Permit 'security.evm' to be updated regardless of
current integrity status.
+ exec.seal_system_mappings = [KNL]
+ Format: { no | yes }
+ Seal system mappings: vdso, vvar, sigpage, vsyscall,
+ uprobe.
+ This overwrites KCONFIG CONFIG_SEAL_SYSTEM_MAPPINGS
+ - 'no': do not seal system mappings.
+ - 'yes': seal system mappings.
+ If not specified or invalid, default is the KCONFIG value.
+ This option has no effect if CONFIG_64BIT=n
+
early_page_ext [KNL,EARLY] Enforces page_ext initialization to earlier
stages so cover more early boot allocations.
Please note that as side effect some optimizations
diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_64.c b/arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_64.c
index 2fb7d53cf333..185553376f39 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_64.c
@@ -366,8 +366,13 @@ void __init map_vsyscall(void)
set_vsyscall_pgtable_user_bits(swapper_pg_dir);
}
- if (vsyscall_mode == XONLY)
- vm_flags_init(&gate_vma, VM_EXEC);
+ if (vsyscall_mode == XONLY) {
+ unsigned long vm_flags = VM_EXEC;
+
+ vm_flags |= seal_system_mappings();
+
+ vm_flags_init(&gate_vma, vm_flags);
+ }
BUILD_BUG_ON((unsigned long)__fix_to_virt(VSYSCALL_PAGE) !=
(unsigned long)VSYSCALL_ADDR);
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index df0a5eac66b7..f787d6c85cbb 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -4238,4 +4238,16 @@ int arch_get_shadow_stack_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long __user *st
int arch_set_shadow_stack_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long status);
int arch_lock_shadow_stack_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long status);
+#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
+/*
+ * return VM_SEALED if seal system mapping is enabled.
+ */
+unsigned long seal_system_mappings(void);
+#else
+static inline unsigned long seal_system_mappings(void)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
#endif /* _LINUX_MM_H */
diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
index 57fd5ab2abe7..bc694c555805 100644
--- a/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/mm/mmap.c
@@ -2133,6 +2133,16 @@ struct vm_area_struct *_install_special_mapping(
unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
unsigned long vm_flags, const struct vm_special_mapping *spec)
{
+ /*
+ * At present, all mappings (vdso, vvar, sigpage, and uprobe) that
+ * invoke the _install_special_mapping function can be sealed.
+ * Therefore, it is logical to call the seal_system_mappings_enabled()
+ * function here. In the future, if this is not the case, i.e. if certain
+ * mappings cannot be sealed, then it would be necessary to move this
+ * check to the calling function.
+ */
+ vm_flags |= seal_system_mappings();
+
return __install_special_mapping(mm, addr, len, vm_flags, (void *)spec,
&special_mapping_vmops);
}
diff --git a/mm/mseal.c b/mm/mseal.c
index ece977bd21e1..0a9d1e9faa28 100644
--- a/mm/mseal.c
+++ b/mm/mseal.c
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
* Author: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...omium.org>
*/
+#include <linux/fs_parser.h>
#include <linux/mempolicy.h>
#include <linux/mman.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
@@ -266,3 +267,41 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(mseal, unsigned long, start, size_t, len, unsigned long,
{
return do_mseal(start, len, flags);
}
+
+/*
+ * Kernel cmdline overwrite for CONFIG_SEAL_SYSTEM_MAPPINGS
+ */
+enum seal_system_mappings_type {
+ SEAL_SYSTEM_MAPPINGS_DISABLED,
+ SEAL_SYSTEM_MAPPINGS_ENABLED
+};
+
+static enum seal_system_mappings_type seal_system_mappings_v __ro_after_init =
+ IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SEAL_SYSTEM_MAPPINGS) ? SEAL_SYSTEM_MAPPINGS_ENABLED :
+ SEAL_SYSTEM_MAPPINGS_DISABLED;
+
+static const struct constant_table value_table_sys_mapping[] __initconst = {
+ { "no", SEAL_SYSTEM_MAPPINGS_DISABLED},
+ { "yes", SEAL_SYSTEM_MAPPINGS_ENABLED},
+ { }
+};
+
+static int __init early_seal_system_mappings_override(char *buf)
+{
+ if (!buf)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ seal_system_mappings_v = lookup_constant(value_table_sys_mapping,
+ buf, seal_system_mappings_v);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+early_param("exec.seal_system_mappings", early_seal_system_mappings_override);
+
+unsigned long seal_system_mappings(void)
+{
+ if (seal_system_mappings_v == SEAL_SYSTEM_MAPPINGS_ENABLED)
+ return VM_SEALED;
+
+ return 0;
+}
diff --git a/security/Kconfig b/security/Kconfig
index 28e685f53bd1..63b87a218943 100644
--- a/security/Kconfig
+++ b/security/Kconfig
@@ -51,6 +51,17 @@ config PROC_MEM_NO_FORCE
endchoice
+config SEAL_SYSTEM_MAPPINGS
+ bool "seal system mappings"
+ default n
+ depends on 64BIT
+ depends on !CHECKPOINT_RESTORE
+ help
+ Seal system mappings such as vdso, vvar, sigpage, vsyscall, uprobes.
+ Note: CHECKPOINT_RESTORE might relocate vdso mapping during restore,
+ and remap will fail if the mapping is sealed, therefore
+ !CHECKPOINT_RESTORE is added as dependency.
+
config SECURITY
bool "Enable different security models"
depends on SYSFS
--
2.47.0.277.g8800431eea-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists