[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241113213724.GJZzUcFKUHCiqGLRqp@fat_crate.local>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 22:37:24 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>, Amit Shah <amit@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, amit.shah@....com,
thomas.lendacky@....com, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com, corbet@....net, mingo@...hat.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
pbonzini@...hat.com, daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com,
kai.huang@...el.com, sandipan.das@....com,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, Babu.Moger@....com,
david.kaplan@....com, dwmw@...zon.co.uk
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] x86: cpu/bugs: update SpectreRSB comments for
AMD
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 01:24:40PM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> There are a lot of subtle details to this $#!tstorm, and IMO we probably
> wouldn't be having these discussions in the first place if the comment
> lived in the docs, as most people seem to ignore them...
That's why I'm saying point to the docs from the code. You can't have a big
fat comment in the code about this but everything else in the hw-vuln docs.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists