[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACePvbVXL8i2_ptfeOcwfDJ=5O_DR+ch+p5D-jLnZ86jfvtSPA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 14:57:27 -0800
From: Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
Usama Arif <usamaarif642@...il.com>, Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>, Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>, Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH hotfix] mm/thp: fix deferred split queue not
partially_mapped: fix
Hi Hugh,
LGTM.
Acked-by: Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>
Chris
On Sun, Nov 10, 2024 at 1:11 PM Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Though even more elusive than before, list_del corruption has still been
> seen on THP's deferred split queue.
>
> The idea in commit e66f3185fa04 was right, but its implementation wrong.
> The context omitted an important comment just before the critical test:
> "split_folio() removes folio from list on success." In ignoring that
> comment, when a THP split succeeded, the code went on to release the
> preceding safe folio, preserving instead an irrelevant (formerly head)
> folio: which gives no safety because it's not on the list. Fix the logic.
>
> Fixes: e66f3185fa04 ("mm/thp: fix deferred split queue not partially_mapped")
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
> ---
> mm/huge_memory.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index 03fd4bc39ea1..5734d5d5060f 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -3790,7 +3790,9 @@ static unsigned long deferred_split_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
> * in the case it was underused, then consider it used and
> * don't add it back to split_queue.
> */
> - if (!did_split && !folio_test_partially_mapped(folio)) {
> + if (did_split) {
> + ; /* folio already removed from list */
> + } else if (!folio_test_partially_mapped(folio)) {
> list_del_init(&folio->_deferred_list);
> removed++;
> } else {
> --
> 2.35.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists