[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <D5KW7A8BZG6K.2L7FEV6SWRZ2D@fairphone.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 09:03:07 +0100
From: "Luca Weiss" <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>
To: "Vedang Nagar" <quic_vnagar@...cinc.com>, "Dmitry Baryshkov"
<dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: <cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org>, "Bjorn Andersson"
<andersson@...nel.org>, "Konrad Dybcio" <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, "Rob
Herring" <robh@...nel.org>, "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Vikash
Garodia (QUIC)" <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: enable venus node
Hi Vedang,
On Wed Nov 13, 2024 at 8:01 AM CET, Vedang Nagar wrote:
> Hi Luca,
> On 11/12/2024 8:49 PM, Luca Weiss wrote:
> > Hi Vedang,
> >
> > On Tue Nov 12, 2024 at 3:39 PM CET, Vedang Nagar wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 11/12/2024 6:43 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 at 08:17, Vedang Nagar <quic_vnagar@...cinc.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 10/7/2024 1:20 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 04:22:31PM GMT, Vedang Nagar wrote:
> >>>>>> Enable the venus node on Qualcomm sc7280. It was made disabled
> >>>>>> earlier to avoid bootup crash, which is fixed now with [1].
> >>>>>
> >>>>> NAK, there might be other reasons to keep venus disabled, like the lack
> >>>>> of the vendor-signed firmware for the particular device.
> >>>> Can you pls elaborate more on this? Any device with sc7280 SOC can use
> >>>> venus.mbn which is already present in linux-firmware git.
> >>>
> >>> Can it though if the device is fused to use vendor keys and to check
> >>> the trust chain?
> >> Yes, infact the existing ones are signed and works with trustzone authentication.
> >
> > No, the venus firmware from linux-firmware does not work on a device
> > with secure boot on, like the (QCM6490) Fairphone 5 smartphone.
> Are you saying even after applying this [1] you are seeing the same ?
>
> [1]
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/patch/20231201-sc7280-venus-pas-v3-2-bc132dc5fc30@fairphone.com/
That patch has been in mainline since v6.9 and my tree is newer, so yes.
See e.g. Qualcomm doc KBA-161204232438 for some details.
Regards
Luca
> >
> > $ rm /lib/firmware/qcom/qcm6490/fairphone5/venus.mbn
> > $ cp /lib/firmware/qcom/vpu-2.0/venus.mbn.zst /lib/firmware/qcom/qcm6490/fairphone5/venus.mbn.zst
> >
> > leads to
> >
> > [ 10.848191] qcom-venus aa00000.video-codec: Adding to iommu group 13
> > [ 10.863062] qcom-venus aa00000.video-codec: non legacy binding
> > [ 10.909555] qcom-venus aa00000.video-codec: error -22 initializing firmware qcom/qcm6490/fairphone5/venus.mbn
> > [ 10.910099] qcom-venus aa00000.video-codec: fail to load video firmware
> > [ 10.910849] qcom-venus aa00000.video-codec: probe with driver qcom-venus failed with error -22
> >
> > It's the same with e.g. adsp firmware, modem firmware, etc.
> >
> > With secure boot off, yes, the hardware will load any firmware
> > regardless of the signature.
> >
> > Regards
> > Luca
> >
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Vedang Nagar
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/20231201-sc7280-venus-pas-v3-2-bc132dc5fc30@fairphone.com/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Vedang Nagar <quic_vnagar@...cinc.com>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 2 --
> >>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists