[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <76da6c05-4f28-41cc-a48e-da2ae16c64c4@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 10:16:32 +0000
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
To: Daniel Wagner <wagi@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Eugenio PĂ©rez <eperezma@...hat.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, megaraidlinux.pdl@...adcom.com,
mpi3mr-linuxdrv.pdl@...adcom.com, MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@...adcom.com,
storagedev@...rochip.com, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] driver core: bus: add irq_get_affinity callback to
bus_type
On 12/11/2024 13:26, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> Introducing a callback in struct bus_type so that a subsystem
> can hook up the getters directly. This approach avoids exposing
> random getters in any subsystems APIs.
>
> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <wagi@...nel.org>
> ---
> include/linux/device/bus.h | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/device/bus.h b/include/linux/device/bus.h
> index cdc4757217f9bb4b36b5c3b8a48bab45737e44c5..b18658bce2c3819fc1cbeb38fb98391d56ec3317 100644
> --- a/include/linux/device/bus.h
> +++ b/include/linux/device/bus.h
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ struct fwnode_handle;
> * will never get called until they do.
> * @remove: Called when a device removed from this bus.
My impression is that this would be better suited to "struct
device_driver", but I assume that there is a good reason to add to
"struct bus_type".
Powered by blists - more mailing lists