lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dceebb5d-9cc6-40ec-b1b4-6ae40cba45fe@stanley.mountain>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 13:13:40 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
	Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
	Xinhui Pan <Xinhui.Pan@....com>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
	Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] drm/amd/amdgpu: Fix spelling mistake "versoin" ->
 "version"

On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 09:53:49AM +0000, Colin Ian King wrote:
> There is a spelling mistake in a dev_err message. Fix it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/mes_v11_0.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/mes_v11_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/mes_v11_0.c
> index 9c905b9e9376..feecd099cf86 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/mes_v11_0.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/mes_v11_0.c
> @@ -646,7 +646,7 @@ static int mes_v11_0_misc_op(struct amdgpu_mes *mes,
>  		break;
>  	case MES_MISC_OP_CHANGE_CONFIG:
>  		if ((mes->adev->mes.sched_version & AMDGPU_MES_VERSION_MASK) < 0x63) {
> -			dev_err(mes->adev->dev, "MES FW versoin must be larger than 0x63 to support limit single process feature.\n");
> +			dev_err(mes->adev->dev, "MES FW version must be larger than 0x63 to support limit single process feature.\n");

What does "to support limit single process feature" mean?

regards,
dan carpenter


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ