[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CY8PR11MB7134D5578EB260FEB1216353895A2@CY8PR11MB7134.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 13:32:08 +0000
From: "Zhuo, Qiuxu" <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>
To: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
CC: "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>, "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com"
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "Mehta, Sohil" <sohil.mehta@...el.com>,
"nik.borisov@...e.com" <nik.borisov@...e.com>, "x86@...nel.org"
<x86@...nel.org>, "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 6/8] x86/mce: Remove the unnecessary {}
Hi Yazen,
> From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
> [...]
>
> Reviewed-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
Thanks!
> But please see note below.
> [...]
> > - case X86_VENDOR_AMD: {
> > + case X86_VENDOR_AMD:
> > mce_amd_feature_init(c);
> > break;
> > - }
> >
> > case X86_VENDOR_HYGON:
> > mce_hygon_feature_init(c);
> > --
>
> I think this could be a bit more substantive if you also combine the AMD and
> HYGON cases. And remove mce_hygon_feature_init() which just calls
> mce_amd_feature_init() anyway.
How about a separate patch for this?
If It's OK for you, I'll follow up on it after the current patch series has settled.
-Qiuxu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists