linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] i3c: master: Add ACPI support to i3c subsystem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZzS1-nJMPiCp5jDi@kuha.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 16:21:46 +0200
From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
	Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
	Sanket.Goswami@....com, linux-i3c@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] i3c: master: Add ACPI support to i3c subsystem

Hi,

On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 01:03:20PM +0530, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:
> As of now, the I3C subsystem only has ARM-specific initialization, and
> there is no corresponding ACPI plumbing present. To address this, ACPI
> support needs to be added to both the I3C core and DW driver.
> 
> Add support to get the ACPI handle from the _HID probed and parse the apci
> object to retrieve the slave information from BIOS.
> 
> Based on the acpi object information propogated via BIOS, build the i3c
> board information so that the same information can be used across the
> driver to handle the slave requests.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Sanket Goswami <Sanket.Goswami@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Sanket Goswami <Sanket.Goswami@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>
> ---
> Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
> 
>  drivers/i3c/internals.h            |  3 ++
>  drivers/i3c/master.c               | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/i3c/master/dw-i3c-master.c |  7 +++
>  include/linux/i3c/master.h         |  1 +
>  4 files changed, 95 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i3c/internals.h b/drivers/i3c/internals.h
> index 433f6088b7ce..178bc0ebe6b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/i3c/internals.h
> +++ b/drivers/i3c/internals.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,9 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/i3c/master.h>
>  
> +#define I3C_GET_PID		0x08
> +#define I3C_GET_ADDR		0x7F
> +
>  void i3c_bus_normaluse_lock(struct i3c_bus *bus);
>  void i3c_bus_normaluse_unlock(struct i3c_bus *bus);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/i3c/master.c b/drivers/i3c/master.c
> index 6f3eb710a75d..0ceef2aa9161 100644
> --- a/drivers/i3c/master.c
> +++ b/drivers/i3c/master.c
> @@ -2251,6 +2251,84 @@ static int of_i3c_master_add_dev(struct i3c_master_controller *master,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI)
> +static int i3c_acpi_configure_master(struct i3c_master_controller *master)
> +{
> +	struct acpi_buffer buf = {ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL};
> +	enum i3c_addr_slot_status addrstatus;
> +	struct i3c_dev_boardinfo *boardinfo;
> +	struct device *dev = &master->dev;
> +	struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
> +	struct acpi_device *adev;
> +	u32 slv_addr, num_dev;
> +	acpi_status status;
> +	u64 val;
> +
> +	status = acpi_evaluate_object_typed(master->ahandle, "_DSD", NULL, &buf, ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE);
> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> +		dev_err(&master->dev, "Error reading _DSD:%s\n", acpi_format_exception(status));
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +	}

Why do you need to do that?

> +	num_dev = device_get_child_node_count(dev);
> +	if (!num_dev) {
> +		dev_err(&master->dev, "Error: no child node present\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}

I think Jarkko already pointed out the problem with that. The whole
check should be dropped.

> +	device_for_each_child_node(dev, fwnode) {
> +		adev = to_acpi_device_node(fwnode);
> +		if (!adev)
> +			return -ENODEV;
> +
> +		status = acpi_evaluate_integer(adev->handle, "_ADR", NULL, &val);
> +		if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> +			dev_err(&master->dev, "Error: eval _ADR failed\n");
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}

val = acpi_device_adr(adev);

> +		slv_addr = val & I3C_GET_ADDR;
> +
> +		boardinfo = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*boardinfo), GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!boardinfo)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +		if (slv_addr) {
> +			if (slv_addr > I3C_MAX_ADDR)
> +				return -EINVAL;
> +
> +			addrstatus = i3c_bus_get_addr_slot_status(&master->bus, slv_addr);
> +			if (addrstatus != I3C_ADDR_SLOT_FREE)
> +				return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +
> +		boardinfo->static_addr = slv_addr;
> +		if (boardinfo->static_addr > I3C_MAX_ADDR)
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +
> +		addrstatus = i3c_bus_get_addr_slot_status(&master->bus,	boardinfo->static_addr);
> +		if (addrstatus != I3C_ADDR_SLOT_FREE)
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +
> +		boardinfo->pid = val >> I3C_GET_PID;
> +		if ((boardinfo->pid & GENMASK_ULL(63, 48)) ||
> +		    I3C_PID_RND_LOWER_32BITS(boardinfo->pid))
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * According to the specification, SETDASA is not supported for DIMM slaves
> +		 * during device discovery. Therefore, BIOS will populate same initial
> +		 * dynamic address as the static address.
> +		 */
> +		boardinfo->init_dyn_addr = boardinfo->static_addr;
> +		list_add_tail(&boardinfo->node, &master->boardinfo.i3c);
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +#else
> +static int i3c_acpi_configure_master(struct i3c_master_controller *master) { return 0; }
> +#endif

I think this code should be placed into a separate file.

If the goal is to add ACPI support for code that is written for DT
only, then I think the first thing to do before that really should be
to convert the existing code to use the unified device property
interface, and move all the DT-only parts to a separate file(s).

thanks,

-- 
heikki