[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <195f8d81-36d8-4730-9911-5797f41c58ad@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 15:33:35 +0100
From: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@...dia.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@...cle.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, Eugenio Perez Martin
<eperezma@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>, Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH vhost 2/2] vdpa/mlx5: Fix suboptimal range on iotlb
iteration
On 13.11.24 07:32, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 04:40:40PM +0300, Dragos Tatulea wrote:
>> From: Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@...cle.com>
>>
>> The starting iova address to iterate iotlb map entry within a range
>> was set to an irrelevant value when passing to the itree_next()
>> iterator, although luckily it doesn't affect the outcome of finding
>> out the granule of the smallest iotlb map size. Fix the code to make
>> it consistent with the following for-loop.
>>
>> Fixes: 94abbccdf291 ("vdpa/mlx5: Add shared memory registration code")
>
>
> But the cover letter says "that's why it does not have a fixes tag".
> Confused.
Sorry about that. Patch is fine with fixes tag, I forgot to drop that
part of the sentence from the cover letter.
Let me know if I need to resend something.
Thanks,
Dragos
Powered by blists - more mailing lists