linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net] can: can327: fix snprintf() limit in can327_handle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e5572514-83d7-4b7e-b4f0-5318c6722250@stanley.mountain>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 18:42:45 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>, Max Staudt <max@...as.org>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] can: can327: fix snprintf() limit in
 can327_handle_prompt()

On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 12:24:17AM +0900, Vincent Mailhol wrote:
> On 15/11/2024 at 00:08, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > I'm happy to re-write the commit message.  Changing snprintf to sprintf() makes
> > me so much less happy...
> 
> OK. Let me amend my previous message. I kind of understood from the past
> exchanges that Max will take the ownership of this patch and credit you
> a with a Reported-by: tag.
> 
> If you keep the ownership of the patch, then that's a different story :)
> 
> I do not want to make you sad and I am fine with your preferred approach.

Then I can just resend this tomorrow.

regards,
dan carpenter