[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241114154704.GHZzYbeDmCV9u1fdVJ@fat_crate.local>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 16:47:04 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/microcode/AMD: Make __verify_patch_size() return
bool
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 04:40:50PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> Right, the important bit here is that max_size is not really max_size but,
I take that back and this really is max_size. I went back and looked. These
are the patches for the older families:
Patch 00: type 1, size: 960
Patch 01: type 1, size: 960
Patch 02: type 1, size: 960
Patch 03: type 1, size: 960
Patch 04: type 1, size: 960
Patch 05: type 1, size: 960
Patch 06: type 1, size: 960
Patch 07: type 1, size: 960
Patch 08: type 1, size: 512
Patch 09: type 1, size: 960
Patch 10: type 1, size: 1568
Patch 11: type 1, size: 1568
Lemme go and look in detail again, just to be sure.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists