[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241114022400.301175-1-linux@treblig.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 02:23:58 +0000
From: linux@...blig.org
To: ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net,
andrii@...nel.org,
martin.lau@...ux.dev,
roberto.sassu@...weicloud.com,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@...blig.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] bpf/umd possible deadcode
From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@...blig.org>
Hi,
I'm not 100% sure about these, since I'm not quite
sure how to test it properly.
As far as I can tell the UMD isn't needed by bpf itself
any more; so I've got one patch that just removes that select.
But then that leaves no users of umd itself; and I split that
separately since I saw there was still some discussion this year
on other uses.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <linux@...blig.org>
Dave
Dr. David Alan Gilbert (2):
bpf: Don't select USERMODE_DRIVER
umd: Remove
include/linux/usermode_driver.h | 19 ----
kernel/Makefile | 1 -
kernel/bpf/preload/Kconfig | 5 -
kernel/usermode_driver.c | 191 --------------------------------
4 files changed, 216 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 include/linux/usermode_driver.h
delete mode 100644 kernel/usermode_driver.c
--
2.47.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists