lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241114131843.0df6a5a2@kf-ir16>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 13:21:41 -0600
From: Aaron Rainbolt <arraybolt3@...il.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>, Luis
 Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, Werner Sembach <wse@...edocomputers.com>,
 tux@...edocomputers.com, Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@...e.com>, Sami Tolvanen
 <samitolvanen@...gle.com>, Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...sung.com>,
 linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thorsten
 Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] module: Block modules by Tuxedo from accessing GPL
 symbols

On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 08:09:17 -0800
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:

> Thanks for doing this!
> 
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>

(Just as a heads-up, I have no affiliation with Tuxedo. Also, I've
tried to tone down my email a bit, but I am pretty upset after looking
at this, and really, *really* do not want to use a kernel that has this
patch set merged. Also, I'm speaking strictly in my own capacity here.)

I might be misunderstanding things here, but does this patch set
prevent end-users from compiling and using Tuxedo's modules themselves
if they want to? AIUI, it's fine to distribute GPLv3 code that is
intended to link against GPLv2 code as long as you don't distribute the
binary you get after compiling and linking. It looks to me like this
patch will prevent users from compiling Tuxedo's modules for personal
use on their own systems though. I personally dislike that for ethical
reasons - I should be able to use whatever code I legally obtain on my
system, and I don't like my use of Linux being wielded against another
open-source project by requiring them to relicense their code or no one
will be able to use their modules.

--
Aaron
Ubuntu Developer
Launchpad: https://launchpad.net/~arraybolt3
Matrix: @arraybolt3:ubuntu.com
Github: https://github.com/ArrayBolt3
Mastodon: @arraybolt3@...res.life

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ