linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk:sophgo: Remove uninitialized variable for CV1800 PLL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZzZhit48lLt3zPlJ@desktop>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 12:46:02 -0800
From: "Ragavendra B.N." <ragavendra.bn@...il.com>
To: Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>
Cc: mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, inochiama@...look.com,
	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk:sophgo: Remove uninitialized variable for CV1800 PLL

On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 07:44:21AM +0800, Chen Wang wrote:
> Hi, Ragavendra,
> 
> This patch should be revision for another https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/20241113025947.3670504-1-ragavendra.bn@gmail.com,
> right? If so you need add version info in the patch title and changelogs
> etc. Please read https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#the-canonical-patch-format
> carefully and re-post the patch.
> 
> Kindly reminder, better declare dropping of this patch email and repost v2.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Chen
> 
> On 2024/11/14 2:46, Ragavendra wrote:
> > Updating the detected value to 0 in the ipll_find_rate and removing it
> > from the method parameters as it does not depend on external input.
> > Updating the calls to ipll_find_rate as well and removing the u32 val
> > variable from ipll_determine_rate.
> > 
> > Fixes: 80fd61ec4612 ("clk: sophgo: Add clock support for CV1800 SoC")
> > Signed-off-by: Ragavendra Nagraj <ragavendra.bn@...il.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-cv18xx-pll.c | 11 ++++-------
> >   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-cv18xx-pll.c b/drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-cv18xx-pll.c
> > index 29e24098bf5f..350195d4ac46 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-cv18xx-pll.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-cv18xx-pll.c
> > @@ -45,14 +45,13 @@ static unsigned long ipll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> >   }
> >   static int ipll_find_rate(const struct cv1800_clk_pll_limit *limit,
> > -			  unsigned long prate, unsigned long *rate,
> > -			  u32 *value)
> > +			  unsigned long prate, unsigned long *rate)
> >   {
> >   	unsigned long best_rate = 0;
> >   	unsigned long trate = *rate;
> >   	unsigned long pre_div_sel = 0, div_sel = 0, post_div_sel = 0;
> >   	unsigned long pre, div, post;
> > -	u32 detected = *value;
> > +	u32 detected = 0;
> >   	unsigned long tmp;
> >   	for_each_pll_limit_range(pre, &limit->pre_div) {
> > @@ -77,7 +76,6 @@ static int ipll_find_rate(const struct cv1800_clk_pll_limit *limit,
> >   		detected = PLL_SET_PRE_DIV_SEL(detected, pre_div_sel);
> >   		detected = PLL_SET_POST_DIV_SEL(detected, post_div_sel);
> >   		detected = PLL_SET_DIV_SEL(detected, div_sel);
> > -		*value = detected;
> >   		*rate = best_rate;
> >   		return 0;
> >   	}
> > @@ -87,11 +85,10 @@ static int ipll_find_rate(const struct cv1800_clk_pll_limit *limit,
> >   static int ipll_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_rate_request *req)
> >   {
> > -	u32 val;
> >   	struct cv1800_clk_pll *pll = hw_to_cv1800_clk_pll(hw);
> >   	return ipll_find_rate(pll->pll_limit, req->best_parent_rate,
> > -			      &req->rate, &val);
> > +			      &req->rate);
> >   }
> >   static void pll_get_mode_ctrl(unsigned long div_sel,
> > @@ -134,7 +131,7 @@ static int ipll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> >   	unsigned long flags;
> >   	struct cv1800_clk_pll *pll = hw_to_cv1800_clk_pll(hw);
> > -	ipll_find_rate(pll->pll_limit, parent_rate, &rate, &detected);
> > +	ipll_find_rate(pll->pll_limit, parent_rate, &rate);
> >   	pll_get_mode_ctrl(PLL_GET_DIV_SEL(detected),
> >   			  ipll_check_mode_ctrl_restrict,
> >   			  pll->pll_limit, &detected);
hi Chen,

This patch is the revision for the https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/20241113025947.3670504-1-ragavendra.bn@gmail.com .
I will update the version info and all and send in another email.

Please feel free to drop this patch email. I will shortly send v2 with the suggested updates.

--
Thanks,
Ragavendra N