[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yce7vswjat2bhda2l4c4ji4idtozo24c7tbmpahz56tmedmpw7@fn2h2t4hv7dd>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 00:52:29 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: qup: use generic device property accessors
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 04:39:23PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
>
>
> On Tue, 08 Oct 2024 18:09:47 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > There's no reason for this driver to use OF-specific property helpers.
> > Drop the last one in favor of the generic variant and no longer include
> > of.h.
> >
> >
>
> Applied, to the GPIO tree as the maintainer has been unresposive for two
> months and the change is trivial.
>
> [1/1] i2c: qup: use generic device property accessors
> commit: 400913bd4edd76ef1775bfd95543846bd6f5ed71
I think it's a bad idea to pull unrelated patches just because you have
a GPIO tree.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists