[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2cc80bf42d4d7862a1f91d3e84e07b38.sboyd@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 14:59:56 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Grégory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>, Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>, Vladimir Kondratiev <vladimir.kondratiev@...ileye.com>
Cc: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik.bayouk@...ileye.com>, Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] clk: eyeq: require clock index with phandle in all cases
Quoting Théo Lebrun (2024-11-06 08:03:55)
> We used to let compatibles with a single clock exposed to not have
> a cell. Switch away from that and enforce a cell in all cases.
>
> This is done at the same time as some compatibles
> (mobileye,eyeq6h-{central,west}-olb) go from one to more clocks
> exposed. Let's do the same switch and avoid future devicetree
> work if/when others follow.
>
> Signed-off-by: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>
> ---
Applied to clk-next
Powered by blists - more mailing lists