[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241114230713.330701-1-irogers@google.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 15:07:10 -0800
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"Ahelenia ZiemiaĆska" <nabijaczleweli@...ijaczleweli.xyz>, Chen Ni <nichen@...as.ac.cn>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 0/3] Prefer evsel over evsel->core.idx
James Clark's patches fixing evsel->core.idx [1] reminded me that we
pass the int value around unnecessarily. Passing the evsel avoids
issues if the evlist is reordered but paired with sanitizers we can
also know when something is used when it shouldn't be. These patches
do some initial work reducing the use of evsel->core.idx or reducing
the API to pass evsels and not their interior index.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241114160450.295844-2-james.clark@linaro.org/
Ian Rogers (3):
perf stream: Use evsel rather than evsel->idx
perf values: Use evsel rather than evsel->idx
perf annotate: Prefer passing evsel to evsel->core.idx
tools/perf/builtin-diff.c | 4 +-
tools/perf/builtin-report.c | 4 +-
tools/perf/builtin-top.c | 4 +-
tools/perf/ui/browsers/annotate.c | 2 +-
tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 32 +++++----
tools/perf/util/annotate.h | 20 +++---
tools/perf/util/stream.c | 7 +-
tools/perf/util/stream.h | 10 +--
tools/perf/util/values.c | 106 +++++++++++++-----------------
tools/perf/util/values.h | 9 +--
10 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-)
--
2.47.0.338.g60cca15819-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists