lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZzWY3iAbgWEDcQzV@LQ3V64L9R2>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 22:29:50 -0800
From: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
	amritha.nambiar@...el.com, sridhar.samudrala@...el.com,
	mkarsten@...terloo.ca, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [net v2 0/2] Fix rcu_read_lock issues in netdev-genl

On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 06:47:35PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 02:17:50 +0000 Joe Damato wrote:
> > base-commit: a58f00ed24b849d449f7134fd5d86f07090fe2f5
> 
> which is a net-next commit.. please rebase on net

I thought I asked about this in the previous thread, but I probably
wasn't clear with my question.

Let me try again:

Patch 1 will apply to net and is a fixes and CC's stable, and fixes
a similar issue to the one Paolo reported, not the exact same path,
though.

Patch 2 will not apply to net, because the code it fixes is not in
net yet. This fixes the splat Paolo reported.

So... back to the question in the cover letter from the RFC :) I
suppose the right thing to do is split the series:

- Rebase patch 1 on net (it applies as is) and send it on its own
- Send patch 2 on its own against net-next

Or... something else ?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ