[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241114070605.bZFvKJ-r@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 08:06:05 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
paulmck@...nel.org, mingo@...nel.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
vschneid@...hat.com, frederic@...nel.org, efault@....de,
sshegde@...ux.ibm.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] rcu: fix header guard for rcu_all_qs()
On 2024-11-06 12:17:53 [-0800], Ankur Arora wrote:
> rcu_all_qs() is defined for !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU but the declaration
> is conditioned on CONFIG_PREEMPTION.
>
> With CONFIG_PREEMPT_LAZY, CONFIG_PREEMPTION=y does not imply
> CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y.
>
> Decouple the two.
>
> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists