[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241114010025.3390836-1-lizhi.xu@windriver.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 09:00:25 +0800
From: Lizhi Xu <lizhi.xu@...driver.com>
To: <dmantipov@...dex.ru>
CC: <alex.aring@...il.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<horms@...nel.org>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org>,
<lizhi.xu@...driver.com>, <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<stefan@...enfreihafen.org>,
<syzbot+985f827280dc3a6e7e92@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
<syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac802154: add a check for slave data list before delete
On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 13:29:55 +0300, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
> On 11/12/24 4:41 PM, Lizhi Xu wrote:
>
> > mutex_lock(&sdata->local->iflist_mtx);
> > + if (list_empty(&sdata->local->interfaces)) {
> > + mutex_unlock(&sdata->local->iflist_mtx);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > list_del_rcu(&sdata->list);
> > mutex_unlock(&sdata->local->iflist_mtx);
>
> Note https://syzkaller.appspot.com/text?tag=ReproC&x=12a9f740580000 makes an
> attempt to connect the only device. How this is expected to work if there are
> more than one device?
There are two locks (rtnl and iflist_mtx) to protection and synchronization
local->interfaces, so no need to worry about multiple devices.
Lizhi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists