[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZzXTbEcrLigXWpAu@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 12:39:40 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpio: Move and sort Kconfig entries as suggested
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 09:54:50AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 6:12 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > The Kconfig under drivers/gpio has a specific comment
> >
> > put drivers in the right section, in alphabetical order
> >
> > but in time some of the entries fell unordered there.
> > Put an order again.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> Could you elaborate on why you're moving drivers between categories?
> For instance: you moved Intel LJCA to USB drivers and I'm sure you
> have a reason for it (it's not clear if this actually is a USB driver,
This one is actually clear as you see that it depends on USB_LJCS which
suggests that it's USB based.
> it's not registered as such
Neither one of the existing ones in that category, right?
> ) but please expand on it in the commit message.
Okay, I will do in v2.
Thank you for the review!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists