lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1fcd2645-e280-4505-aa75-f5a6510b5940@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 18:37:01 +0800
From: Tuo Li <islituo@...il.com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Ayush Sawal <ayush.sawal@...lsio.com>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Dragos Tatulea
 <dtatulea@...dia.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>,
 Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] chcr_ktls: fix a possible null-pointer dereference in
 chcr_ktls_dev_add()



On 2024/11/8 23:00, Markus Elfring wrote:
> …
>> Consider the following execution scenario:
>>
>>   chcr_ktls_cpl_act_open_rpl()   //641
>>     u_ctx = adap->uld[CXGB4_ULD_KTLS].handle;   //686
>>     if (u_ctx) {  //687
>>     complete(&tx_info->completion);  //704
>>
>> The variable u_ctx is checked by an if statement at Line 687, which means
>> it can be NULL. Then, complete() is called at Line 704, which will wake
>> up wait_for_completion_xxx().
> …
> 
> To which software revision would you like to refer here?
> 
> How does the presented information fit to a statement like the following?
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc6/source/drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/inline_crypto/ch_ktls/chcr_ktls.c#L442
> 
> 	if (u_ctx && u_ctx->detach)
> 		goto out;

We have run our tool on Linux 6.11, and the line numbers correspond to the
code in that version.

> Would you eventually like to trace the control flow back any further
> for the data structure member “handle”?
> 

I have traced the control flow further for the data structure member
'handle,' but I have not found where the member is assigned a NULL value. I
am not sure if I might have overlooked something.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ