linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the powerpc tree with the kbuild tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87bjyivbre.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 12:34:45 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Masahiro Yamada
 <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Cc: PowerPC <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
 <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the powerpc tree with the kbuild tree

Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the powerpc tree got a conflict in:
>
>   arch/powerpc/Makefile
>
> between commit:
>
>   de51342c5157 ("kbuild: add $(objtree)/ prefix to some in-kernel build artifacts")
>
> from the kbuild tree and commit:
>
>   bee08a9e6ab0 ("powerpc: Adjust adding stack protector flags to KBUILD_CLAGS for clang")
>
> from the powerpc tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Ack.

cheers