[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241114111409.LWKp5YEg@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 12:14:09 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>, Xuerui Wang <kernel@...0n.name>,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, Clark Williams <clrkwllms@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] LoongArch: Allow to enable PREEMPT_RT
On 2024-11-14 19:07:37 [+0800], Huacai Chen wrote:
> Hi, Sebastian,
Hi,
> > Why is ntpd/chronyd service affecting this? Is it running at prio 99?
> > Otherwise it should not be noticed.
> No, ntpd/chronyd doesn't affect latency. But they may trigger RTC
> synchronization every 11 minutes, and RTC synchronization affects
> latency. We can keep ntpd/chronyd running but disable RTC
> synchronization by configuration, this is the least aggressive method.
What is "RTC synchronization" in this context?
> > Is lockdep complaining in any workloads?
> > Is CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP leading to any complains?
> This needs more tests because I haven't enabled them.
That would be good. It would show if there is anything that has not yet
been noticed.
> Huacai
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists