linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] nvme-pci: 512 byte aligned dma pool segment quirk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1932acbb3d1.10d91b9c8590854.6159524670771006351@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 13:10:13 +0000
From: Robert Beckett <bob.beckett@...labora.com>
To: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@....de>
Cc: "Keith Busch" <kbusch@...nel.org>, "Jens Axboe" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	"Sagi Grimberg" <sagi@...mberg.me>, "kernel" <kernel@...labora.com>,
	"linux-nvme" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme-pci: 512 byte aligned dma pool segment quirk






 ---- On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 05:55:44 +0000  Christoph Hellwig  wrote --- 
 > On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 11:05:53AM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
 > > Well, he's doing what I suggested. I thought this was better because it
 > > puts the decision making in the initialization path instead of the IO
 > > path.
 > 
 > I guess it's fine in that regard.  It just usually expect patch
 > authors to at least reply to reviews..
 > 
apologies for not replying directly. I assumed a new patch would suffice.