lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1a36456b-4844-4827-ab53-598ec14d7437@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 14:56:59 +0100
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Michael Walle <mwalle@...nel.org>,
 Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>
Cc: kernel@...labora.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Matthias Brugger
 <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, Biao Huang <biao.huang@...iatek.com>,
 Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
 Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
 Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
 Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
 Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: mediatek: Set mediatek,mac-wol on
 DWMAC node for all boards

Il 14/11/24 13:29, Michael Walle ha scritto:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu Nov 14, 2024 at 10:26 AM CET, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>> Il 09/11/24 16:16, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado ha scritto:
>>> Due to the mediatek,mac-wol property previously being handled backwards
>>> by the dwmac-mediatek driver, its use in the DTs seems to have been
>>> inconsistent.
>>>
>>> Now that the driver has been fixed, correct this description. All the
>>> currently upstream boards support MAC WOL, so add the mediatek,mac-wol
>>> property to the missing ones.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>
>>> ---
>>>    arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt2712-evb.dts                   | 1 +
>>>    arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-demo.dts                  | 1 +
>>>    arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8395-kontron-3-5-sbc-i1200.dts | 1 +
>>>    3 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>
>>
>> ..snip..
>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-demo.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-demo.dts
>>> index 31d424b8fc7cedef65489392eb279b7fd2194a4a..c12684e8c449b2d7b3b3a79086925bfe5ae0d8f8 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-demo.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8195-demo.dts
>>> @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ &eth {
>>>    	pinctrl-names = "default", "sleep";
>>>    	pinctrl-0 = <&eth_default_pins>;
>>>    	pinctrl-1 = <&eth_sleep_pins>;
>>> +	mediatek,mac-wol;
>>
>> The demo board has the same WoL capability as the EVK, so you can avoid adding the
>> mac-wol property here.
> 
> Not sure I can follow you here.
> 

That's in the sense that they do WoL through the MAC and not through the PHY (as
in, it's the MAC that has to be configured for WoL and not *only* the PHY).

>>
>>>    	status = "okay";
>>>    
>>>    	mdio {
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8395-kontron-3-5-sbc-i1200.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8395-kontron-3-5-sbc-i1200.dts
>>> index e2e75b8ff91880711c82f783c7ccbef4128b7ab4..4985b65925a9ed10ad44a6e58b9657a9dd48751f 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8395-kontron-3-5-sbc-i1200.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8395-kontron-3-5-sbc-i1200.dts
>>> @@ -271,6 +271,7 @@ &eth {
>>>    	pinctrl-names = "default", "sleep";
>>>    	pinctrl-0 = <&eth_default_pins>;
>>>    	pinctrl-1 = <&eth_sleep_pins>;
>>> +	mediatek,mac-wol;
>>
>> I'm mostly sure that Kontron's i1200 works the same as the EVK in regards to WoL.
>>
>> Michael, I recall you worked on this board - can you please confirm?
> 
> I'd say so. Honestly, I've never tried WoL on this board, but I'm
> not aware of any difference to the *demo* board (not the EVK).

Thanks for confirming. I will ignore the devicetree commit entirely then, as this
would ...un...fix the fix (meaning that patch [1/2] is good!).

Cheers,
Angelo

> 
> -michael



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ