[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241115190316.28A6B18DFF2@bout3.ijzerbout.nl>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 19:46:25 +0100
From: Kees Bakker <kees@...erbout.nl>
To: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
Tian Kevin <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1] iommu: Avoid use of NULL after WARN_ON_ONCE
There is a WARN_ON_ONCE to catch an unlikely situation when
domain_remove_dev_pasid can't find the `pasid`. In case it nevertheless
happens we must avoid using a NULL pointer.
Signed-off-by: Kees Bakker <kees@...erbout.nl>
---
drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
index 527f6f89d8a1..204873976ef3 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
@@ -4096,13 +4096,14 @@ void domain_remove_dev_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
break;
}
}
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!dev_pasid);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dmar_domain->lock, flags);
cache_tag_unassign_domain(dmar_domain, dev, pasid);
domain_detach_iommu(dmar_domain, iommu);
- intel_iommu_debugfs_remove_dev_pasid(dev_pasid);
- kfree(dev_pasid);
+ if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(!dev_pasid)) {
+ intel_iommu_debugfs_remove_dev_pasid(dev_pasid);
+ kfree(dev_pasid);
+ }
}
static void intel_iommu_remove_dev_pasid(struct device *dev, ioasid_t pasid,
--
2.47.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists