[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241115205114.GCZze0QtUKbeXdFEHe@fat_crate.local>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 21:51:14 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de_schampheleire@...ia.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: x86/amd late microcode thread loading slows down boot
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 12:03:41PM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> "invlpg %0" :: "m" (*(char *)addr) : "memory"
>
> The compiler can usually do a better job than forcing it into a plain
> register.
I guess. I'll do that in the final version as the invlpg carve out will be
a separate patch.
> Ok, so it's Fam17h specific. That's good to know. Any formal statement
> on the matter from AMD ?
You can use my commit message for now... I'm working on something more
formal although I have no idea yet what format that should have ...
> However, these blobs are 3200 bytes long and come with a good chance of
> crossing a page boundary. If you're invlpg'ing, you need to issue a
> second one for the final byte of the image too.
Right, see below. It works here, Thomas you could give it a try too.
---
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlb.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlb.h
index 580636cdc257..4d3c9d00d6b6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlb.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlb.h
@@ -34,4 +34,8 @@ static inline void __tlb_remove_table(void *table)
free_page_and_swap_cache(table);
}
+static inline void invlpg(unsigned long addr)
+{
+ asm volatile("invlpg (%0)" ::"r" (addr) : "memory");
+}
#endif /* _ASM_X86_TLB_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
index c4991226c86b..fdd4f8ef3696 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
#include <asm/setup.h>
#include <asm/cpu.h>
#include <asm/msr.h>
+#include <asm/tlb.h>
#include "internal.h"
@@ -483,11 +484,23 @@ static void scan_containers(u8 *ucode, size_t size, struct cont_desc *desc)
}
}
-static int __apply_microcode_amd(struct microcode_amd *mc)
+static int __apply_microcode_amd(struct microcode_amd *mc, unsigned int psize)
{
+ unsigned long p_addr = (unsigned long)&mc->hdr.data_code;
u32 rev, dummy;
- native_wrmsrl(MSR_AMD64_PATCH_LOADER, (u64)(long)&mc->hdr.data_code);
+ native_wrmsrl(MSR_AMD64_PATCH_LOADER, p_addr);
+
+ if (x86_family(bsp_cpuid_1_eax) == 0x17) {
+ invlpg(p_addr);
+
+ /*
+ * Flush next page too if patch image is crossing a page
+ * boundary.
+ */
+ if (p_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT != (p_addr + psize) >> PAGE_SHIFT)
+ invlpg(p_addr + psize);
+ }
/* verify patch application was successful */
native_rdmsr(MSR_AMD64_PATCH_LEVEL, rev, dummy);
@@ -529,7 +542,7 @@ static bool early_apply_microcode(u32 old_rev, void *ucode, size_t size)
if (old_rev > mc->hdr.patch_id)
return ret;
- return !__apply_microcode_amd(mc);
+ return !__apply_microcode_amd(mc, desc.psize);
}
static bool get_builtin_microcode(struct cpio_data *cp)
@@ -748,7 +761,7 @@ void reload_ucode_amd(unsigned int cpu)
rdmsr(MSR_AMD64_PATCH_LEVEL, rev, dummy);
if (rev < mc->hdr.patch_id) {
- if (!__apply_microcode_amd(mc))
+ if (!__apply_microcode_amd(mc, p->size))
pr_info_once("reload revision: 0x%08x\n", mc->hdr.patch_id);
}
}
@@ -801,7 +814,7 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_amd(int cpu)
goto out;
}
- if (__apply_microcode_amd(mc_amd)) {
+ if (__apply_microcode_amd(mc_amd, p->size)) {
pr_err("CPU%d: update failed for patch_level=0x%08x\n",
cpu, mc_amd->hdr.patch_id);
return UCODE_ERROR;
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index 86593d1b787d..b0678d59ebdb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
#include <asm/apic.h>
#include <asm/perf_event.h>
+#include <asm/tlb.h>
#include "mm_internal.h"
@@ -1140,7 +1141,7 @@ STATIC_NOPV void native_flush_tlb_one_user(unsigned long addr)
bool cpu_pcide;
/* Flush 'addr' from the kernel PCID: */
- asm volatile("invlpg (%0)" ::"r" (addr) : "memory");
+ invlpg(addr);
/* If PTI is off there is no user PCID and nothing to flush. */
if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PTI))
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists