[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8734jtl3xm.ffs@tglx>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 01:46:13 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@...hat.com>, Damien Le Moal
<dlemoal@...nel.org>, Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>, Basavaraj Natikar
<basavaraj.natikar@....com>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, Benjamin
Tissoires <bentiss@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Greg
Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Alex Dubov <oakad@...oo.com>,
Sudarsana Kalluru <skalluru@...vell.com>, Manish Chopra
<manishc@...vell.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S.
Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub
Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rasesh Mody
<rmody@...vell.com>, GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@...vell.com, Igor Mitsyanko
<imitsyanko@...ntenna.com>, Sergey Matyukevich <geomatsi@...il.com>, Kalle
Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>, Sanjay R Mehta <sanju.mehta@....com>, Shyam Sundar
S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>, Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>, Dave Jiang
<dave.jiang@...el.com>, Allen Hubbe <allenbh@...il.com>, Bjorn Helgaas
<bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, Stefano Stabellini
<sstabellini@...nel.org>, Oleksandr Tyshchenko
<oleksandr_tyshchenko@...m.com>, Mario Limonciello
<mario.limonciello@....com>, Chen Ni <nichen@...as.ac.cn>, Ricky Wu
<ricky_wu@...ltek.com>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Breno Leitao
<leitao@...ian.org>, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>, Mostafa Saleh
<smostafa@...gle.com>, Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Yi
Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>, Kunwu Chan <chentao@...inos.cn>, Ankit Agrawal
<ankita@...dia.com>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Reinette
Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>, Eric
Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>, Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, ntb@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/11] Remove devres from pci_intx()
On Thu, Nov 14 2024 at 10:05, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-11-13 at 17:22 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 13 2024 at 13:41, Philipp Stanner wrote:
>> > pci_intx() is a hybrid function which can sometimes be managed
>> > through
>> > devres. This hybrid nature is undesirable.
>> >
>> > Since all users of pci_intx() have by now been ported either to
>> > always-managed pcim_intx() or never-managed pci_intx_unmanaged(),
>> > the
>> > devres functionality can be removed from pci_intx().
>> >
>> > Consequently, pci_intx_unmanaged() is now redundant, because
>> > pci_intx()
>> > itself is now unmanaged.
>> >
>> > Remove the devres functionality from pci_intx(). Have all users of
>> > pci_intx_unmanaged() call pci_intx(). Remove pci_intx_unmanaged().
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@...hat.com>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/misc/cardreader/rtsx_pcr.c | 2 +-
>> > drivers/misc/tifm_7xx1.c | 6 +--
>> > .../net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c | 2 +-
>> > drivers/net/ethernet/brocade/bna/bnad.c | 2 +-
>> > drivers/ntb/hw/amd/ntb_hw_amd.c | 4 +-
>> > drivers/ntb/hw/intel/ntb_hw_gen1.c | 2 +-
>> > drivers/pci/devres.c | 4 +-
>> > drivers/pci/msi/api.c | 2 +-
>> > drivers/pci/msi/msi.c | 2 +-
>> > drivers/pci/pci.c | 43 +--------------
>> > ----
>> > drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c | 2 +-
>> > drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_intrs.c | 10 ++---
>> > drivers/xen/xen-pciback/conf_space_header.c | 2 +-
>> > include/linux/pci.h | 1 -
>> > 14 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>>
>> Now I'm utterly confused. This undoes the pci_intx_unmanaged() churn
>> which you carefully split into several patches first.
>
> Have you read the email I have linked?
>
> There is also the cover-letter (does anyone in the community ever read
> those?) which explicitly states:
>
> "Patch "Remove devres from pci_intx()" obviously reverts the previous
> patches that made drivers use pci_intx_unmanaged(). But this way it's
> easier to review and approve. It also makes sure that each checked out
> commit should provide correct behavior, not just the entire series as a
> whole."
I read it and I assume your intention was to force an eye on every use
case of pci_intx() and not just on those which need to be converted to
pcim_intx().
I'm not convinced that this is needed, but fair enough.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists