lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <be11e656-a8be-4603-bd8f-01e3bdc56677@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 08:15:34 +0200
From: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>,
 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] dt-bindings: ROHM KX134ACR-LBZ

On 14/11/2024 22:10, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 01:20:49PM +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
>> Add compatible and information for ROHM KX134ACR-LBZ accelerometer.
> 
> The commit message mention what makes this device incompatible - but
> I'll let you away with it the description below contains it.
> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>

Thanks for pointing it out Conor. I agree the commit message should 
describe the KX134ACR-LBZ a bit better. I'll improve the commit message 
to include the g-range difference if I re-spin this series - and try to 
remember this if I get to support also some other variants :) A very 
good head's up for me as I didn't even think of describing the 
differences in commit message!

Yours,
	-- Matti


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ