[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <nw2sqnxmhntvizzvygfho6nhiwfni4xfquwst5gd5g2tel6pnr@h66d4mw46jcf>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 09:33:42 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
Cc: Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@...cinc.com>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Connor Abbott <cwabbott0@...il.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 6/8] drm/msm: adreno: enable GMU bandwidth for A740
and A750
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 04:48:32PM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Now all the DDR bandwidth voting via the GPU Management Unit (GMU)
> is in place, let's declare the Bus Control Modules (BCMs) and
s/let's //g
> it's parameters in the GPU info struct and add the GMU_BW_VOTE
> quirk to enable it.
Can we define a function that checks for info.bcm[0].name isntead of
adding a quirk?
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
> index 0c560e84ad5a53bb4e8a49ba4e153ce9cf33f7ae..014a24256b832d8e03fe06a6516b5348a5c0474a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
> @@ -1379,7 +1379,8 @@ static const struct adreno_info a7xx_gpus[] = {
> .inactive_period = DRM_MSM_INACTIVE_PERIOD,
> .quirks = ADRENO_QUIRK_HAS_CACHED_COHERENT |
> ADRENO_QUIRK_HAS_HW_APRIV |
> - ADRENO_QUIRK_PREEMPTION,
> + ADRENO_QUIRK_PREEMPTION |
> + ADRENO_QUIRK_GMU_BW_VOTE,
> .init = a6xx_gpu_init,
> .zapfw = "a740_zap.mdt",
> .a6xx = &(const struct a6xx_info) {
> @@ -1388,6 +1389,16 @@ static const struct adreno_info a7xx_gpus[] = {
> .pwrup_reglist = &a7xx_pwrup_reglist,
> .gmu_chipid = 0x7020100,
> .gmu_cgc_mode = 0x00020202,
> + .bcm = {
> + [0] = { .name = "SH0", .buswidth = 16 },
> + [1] = { .name = "MC0", .buswidth = 4 },
> + [2] = {
> + .name = "ACV",
> + .fixed = true,
> + .perfmode = BIT(3),
> + .perfmode_bw = 16500000,
Is it a platform property or GPU / GMU property? Can expect that there
might be several SoCs having the same GPU, but different perfmode_bw
entry?
> + },
> + },
> },
> .address_space_size = SZ_16G,
> .preempt_record_size = 4192 * SZ_1K,
> @@ -1424,7 +1435,8 @@ static const struct adreno_info a7xx_gpus[] = {
> .inactive_period = DRM_MSM_INACTIVE_PERIOD,
> .quirks = ADRENO_QUIRK_HAS_CACHED_COHERENT |
> ADRENO_QUIRK_HAS_HW_APRIV |
> - ADRENO_QUIRK_PREEMPTION,
> + ADRENO_QUIRK_PREEMPTION |
> + ADRENO_QUIRK_GMU_BW_VOTE,
> .init = a6xx_gpu_init,
> .zapfw = "gen70900_zap.mbn",
> .a6xx = &(const struct a6xx_info) {
> @@ -1432,6 +1444,16 @@ static const struct adreno_info a7xx_gpus[] = {
> .pwrup_reglist = &a7xx_pwrup_reglist,
> .gmu_chipid = 0x7090100,
> .gmu_cgc_mode = 0x00020202,
> + .bcm = {
> + [0] = { .name = "SH0", .buswidth = 16 },
> + [1] = { .name = "MC0", .buswidth = 4 },
> + [2] = {
> + .name = "ACV",
> + .fixed = true,
> + .perfmode = BIT(2),
> + .perfmode_bw = 10687500,
> + },
> + },
> },
> .address_space_size = SZ_16G,
> .preempt_record_size = 3572 * SZ_1K,
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists