[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241115011709.1022217-1-zhaomzhao@126.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 09:17:09 +0800
From: Zhao Mengmeng <zhaomzhao@....com>
To: tj@...nel.org,
void@...ifault.com
Cc: zhaomengmeng@...inos.cn,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] sched_ext: Replace scx_next_task_picked() with switch_class() in comment
From: Zhao Mengmeng <zhaomengmeng@...inos.cn>
scx_next_task_picked() has been replaced with siwtch_class(), but comment
is still referencing old one, so replace it.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Mengmeng <zhaomengmeng@...inos.cn>
---
kernel/sched/ext.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
index 0036696e7063..9f9bc2930658 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@ -2759,7 +2759,7 @@ static int balance_one(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
* If the previous sched_class for the current CPU was not SCX,
* notify the BPF scheduler that it again has control of the
* core. This callback complements ->cpu_release(), which is
- * emitted in scx_next_task_picked().
+ * emitted in switch_class().
*/
if (SCX_HAS_OP(cpu_acquire))
SCX_CALL_OP(SCX_KF_REST, cpu_acquire, cpu_of(rq), NULL);
@@ -6091,7 +6091,7 @@ static void kick_cpus_irq_workfn(struct irq_work *irq_work)
if (cpu != cpu_of(this_rq)) {
/*
* Pairs with smp_store_release() issued by this CPU in
- * scx_next_task_picked() on the resched path.
+ * switch_class() on the resched path.
*
* We busy-wait here to guarantee that no other task can
* be scheduled on our core before the target CPU has
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists