[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZzcKY8hap3OMqTjC@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 16:46:27 +0800
From: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@...hat.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
Eric Farman <farman@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/11] fs/proc/vmcore: kdump support for virtio-mem on
s390
On 10/25/24 at 05:11pm, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> This is based on "[PATCH v3 0/7] virtio-mem: s390 support" [1], which adds
> virtio-mem support on s390.
>
> The only "different than everything else" thing about virtio-mem on s390
> is kdump: The crash (2nd) kernel allocates+prepares the elfcore hdr
> during fs_init()->vmcore_init()->elfcorehdr_alloc(). Consequently, the
> crash kernel must detect memory ranges of the crashed/panicked kernel to
> include via PT_LOAD in the vmcore.
>
> On other architectures, all RAM regions (boot + hotplugged) can easily be
> observed on the old (to crash) kernel (e.g., using /proc/iomem) to create
> the elfcore hdr.
>
> On s390, information about "ordinary" memory (heh, "storage") can be
> obtained by querying the hypervisor/ultravisor via SCLP/diag260, and
> that information is stored early during boot in the "physmem" memblock
> data structure.
>
> But virtio-mem memory is always detected by as device driver, which is
> usually build as a module. So in the crash kernel, this memory can only be
~~~~~~~~~~~
Is it 1st kernel or 2nd kernel?
Usually we call the 1st kernel as panicked kernel, crashed kernel, the
2nd kernel as kdump kernel.
> properly detected once the virtio-mem driver started up.
>
> The virtio-mem driver already supports the "kdump mode", where it won't
> hotplug any memory but instead queries the device to implement the
> pfn_is_ram() callback, to avoid reading unplugged memory holes when reading
> the vmcore.
>
> With this series, if the virtio-mem driver is included in the kdump
> initrd -- which dracut already takes care of under Fedora/RHEL -- it will
> now detect the device RAM ranges on s390 once it probes the devices, to add
> them to the vmcore using the same callback mechanism we already have for
> pfn_is_ram().
Do you mean on s390 virtio-mem memory region will be detected and added
to vmcore in kdump kernel when virtio-mem driver is initialized? Not
sure if I understand it correctly.
>
> To add these device RAM ranges to the vmcore ("patch the vmcore"), we will
> add new PT_LOAD entries that describe these memory ranges, and update
> all offsets vmcore size so it is all consistent.
>
> Note that makedumfile is shaky with v6.12-rcX, I made the "obvious" things
> (e.g., free page detection) work again while testing as documented in [2].
>
> Creating the dumps using makedumpfile seems to work fine, and the
> dump regions (PT_LOAD) are as expected. I yet have to check in more detail
> if the created dumps are good (IOW, the right memory was dumped, but it
> looks like makedumpfile reads the right memory when interpreting the
> kernel data structures, which is promising).
>
> Patch #1 -- #6 are vmcore preparations and cleanups
> Patch #7 adds the infrastructure for drivers to report device RAM
> Patch #8 + #9 are virtio-mem preparations
> Patch #10 implements virtio-mem support to report device RAM
> Patch #11 activates it for s390, implementing a new function to fill
> PT_LOAD entry for device RAM
>
> [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241025141453.1210600-1-david@redhat.com
> [2] https://github.com/makedumpfile/makedumpfile/issues/16
>
> Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> Cc: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Cc: "Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@...hat.com>
> Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
> Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
> Cc: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
> Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
> Cc: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
> Cc: Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Eric Farman <farman@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
>
> David Hildenbrand (11):
> fs/proc/vmcore: convert vmcore_cb_lock into vmcore_mutex
> fs/proc/vmcore: replace vmcoredd_mutex by vmcore_mutex
> fs/proc/vmcore: disallow vmcore modifications after the vmcore was
> opened
> fs/proc/vmcore: move vmcore definitions from kcore.h to crash_dump.h
> fs/proc/vmcore: factor out allocating a vmcore memory node
> fs/proc/vmcore: factor out freeing a list of vmcore ranges
> fs/proc/vmcore: introduce PROC_VMCORE_DEVICE_RAM to detect device RAM
> ranges in 2nd kernel
> virtio-mem: mark device ready before registering callbacks in kdump
> mode
> virtio-mem: remember usable region size
> virtio-mem: support CONFIG_PROC_VMCORE_DEVICE_RAM
> s390/kdump: virtio-mem kdump support (CONFIG_PROC_VMCORE_DEVICE_RAM)
>
> arch/s390/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/s390/kernel/crash_dump.c | 39 +++--
> drivers/virtio/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c | 103 +++++++++++++-
> fs/proc/Kconfig | 25 ++++
> fs/proc/vmcore.c | 258 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> include/linux/crash_dump.h | 47 +++++++
> include/linux/kcore.h | 13 --
> 8 files changed, 396 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.46.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists