lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZzcaA4PMHRcsEaDt@ryzen>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 10:53:07 +0100
From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
	Krzysztof WilczyƄski <kw@...ux.com>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	imx@...ts.linux.dev, dlemoal@...nel.org, maz@...nel.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, jdmason@...zu.us
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/6] PCI: endpoint: Add pci_epf_align_addr() helper
 for address alignment

On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 05:52:39PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> Introduce the helper function pci_epf_align_addr() to adjust addresses
> according to PCI BAR alignment requirements, converting addresses into base
> and offset values.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
> ---
> change from v6 to v7
> - new patch
> ---
>  drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/pci-epf.h             | 13 +++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 52 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c
> index 8fa2797d4169a..a3f172cc786e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c
> @@ -464,6 +464,45 @@ struct pci_epf *pci_epf_create(const char *name)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epf_create);
>  
> +/**
> + * pci_epf_align_addr() - Get base address and offset that match bar's
> + *			  alignment requirement
> + * @epf: the EPF device
> + * @addr: the address of the memory
> + * @bar: the BAR number corresponding to map addr
> + * @base: return base address, which match BAR's alignment requirement, nothing
> + *	  return if NULL
> + * @off: return offset, nothing return if NULL
> + *
> + * Helper function to convert input 'addr' to base and offset, which match
> + * BAR's alignment requirement.
> + */
> +int pci_epf_align_addr(struct pci_epf *epf, enum pci_barno bar, u64 addr, u64 *base, size_t *off)

Nit: perhaps rename this function to:
pci_epf_align_ib_addr()
or
pci_epf_align_inbound_addr()

to more clearly not confuse this with:
if (epc->ops->align_addr)
.align_addr()
(Ideally those functions should have been named align_ob_addr(),
or align_outbound_addr())


> +{
> +	const struct pci_epc_features *epc_features;
> +	u64 align;
> +
> +	epc_features = pci_epc_get_features(epf->epc, epf->func_no, epf->vfunc_no);
> +	if (!epc_features) {
> +		dev_err(&epf->dev, "epc_features not implemented\n");
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +	}
> +
> +	align = epc_features->align;
> +	align = align ? align : 128;
> +	if (epc_features->bar[bar].type == BAR_FIXED)
> +		align = max(epc_features->bar[bar].fixed_size, align);
> +
> +	if (base)
> +		*base = round_down(addr, align);
> +
> +	if (off)
> +		*off = addr & (align - 1);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_epf_align_addr);
> +
>  static void pci_epf_dev_release(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct pci_epf *epf = to_pci_epf(dev);
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci-epf.h b/include/linux/pci-epf.h
> index 5374e6515ffa0..20f4f31ba9b36 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci-epf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci-epf.h
> @@ -238,6 +238,19 @@ void *pci_epf_alloc_space(struct pci_epf *epf, size_t size, enum pci_barno bar,
>  			  enum pci_epc_interface_type type);
>  void pci_epf_free_space(struct pci_epf *epf, void *addr, enum pci_barno bar,
>  			enum pci_epc_interface_type type);
> +
> +int pci_epf_align_addr(struct pci_epf *epf, enum pci_barno bar, u64 addr, u64 *base, size_t *off);
> +static inline int pci_epf_align_addr_lo_hi(struct pci_epf *epf, enum pci_barno bar,
> +					   u32 low, u32 high, u64 *base, size_t *off)
> +{
> +	u64 addr = high;
> +
> +	addr <<= 32;
> +	addr |= low;
> +
> +	return pci_epf_align_addr(epf, bar, addr, base, off);
> +}

I'm not sure if this function deserves to live :)
Can't the caller just do this before calling pci_epf_align_addr() ?


Kind regards,
Niklas

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ