linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] module: Block some modules by TUXEDO from accessing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3023bbda-0902-4e5c-aeb1-074623cd8ff0@tuxedocomputers.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 14:03:27 +0100
From: Werner Sembach <wse@...edocomputers.com>
To: u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com, mcgrof@...nel.org, petr.pavlu@...e.com,
 samitolvanen@...gle.com, da.gomez@...sung.com,
 linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux@...mhuis.info, vv@...edocomputers.com, cs@...edo.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] module: Block some modules by TUXEDO from
 accessing

Am 15.11.24 um 13:58 schrieb Werner Sembach:
> Following the meeting I wrote about yesterday, I now changed the license
> of what we could change spontaniously to prove good faith.
>
> I still hope that the rest can be sorted out before anything gets merged.
> We are working on it. A clear time window would still be helpfull.
>
> At Uwe. I don't know how it works if you modifiy someone elses code. I
> removed the Signed-off-by: line and I guess you have to add it again?
>
> v2: Removed modules that could and have been spontaniously relicensed
> v3: Fix typo and remove untrue assumption while giving more context
>
Wrong version in the cover letter, but should be no problem should it?

I need to grab lunch ...