[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZzdOOP0KuMMdo64W@lpieralisi>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 14:35:52 +0100
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>
To: Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@...cinc.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>, Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org,
Satya Durga Srinivasu Prabhala <quic_satyap@...cinc.com>,
Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@...cinc.com>,
Shivendra Pratap <quic_spratap@...cinc.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] firmware: psci: Read and use vendor reset types
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 09:30:21AM -0700, Elliot Berman wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 10:42:46PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Elliot Berman (2024-10-18 12:39:48)
> > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
> > > index 2328ca58bba6..60bc285622ce 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c
> > > @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@
> > > #include <asm/smp_plat.h>
> > > #include <asm/suspend.h>
> > >
> > > +#define REBOOT_PREFIX "mode-"
> >
> > Maybe move this near the function that uses it.
> >
> > > +
> > > /*
> > > * While a 64-bit OS can make calls with SMC32 calling conventions, for some
> > > * calls it is necessary to use SMC64 to pass or return 64-bit values.
> > > @@ -305,9 +315,29 @@ static int get_set_conduit_method(const struct device_node *np)
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static void psci_vendor_sys_reset2(unsigned long action, void *data)
> > > +{
> > > + const char *cmd = data;
> > > + unsigned long ret;
> > > + size_t i;
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < num_psci_reset_params; i++) {
> > > + if (!strcmp(psci_reset_params[i].mode, cmd)) {
> > > + ret = invoke_psci_fn(PSCI_FN_NATIVE(1_1, SYSTEM_RESET2),
> > > + psci_reset_params[i].reset_type,
> > > + psci_reset_params[i].cookie, 0);
> > > + pr_err("failed to perform reset \"%s\": %ld\n",
> > > + cmd, (long)ret);
> >
> > Do this intentionally return? Should it be some other function that's
> > __noreturn instead and a while (1) if the firmware returns back to the
> > kernel?
> >
>
> Yes, I think it's best to make sure we fall back to the architectural
> reset (whether it's the SYSTEM_RESET or architectural SYSTEM_RESET2)
> since device would reboot then.
Well, that's one of the doubts I have about enabling this code. From
userspace we are requesting a reboot (I don't even think that user
space knows which reboot modes are actually implemented (?)) and we may
end up issuing one with completely different semantics ?
Are these "reset types" exported to user space ?
Lorenzo
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static int psci_sys_reset(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action,
> > > void *data)
> > > {
> > > + if (data && num_psci_reset_params)
> > > + psci_vendor_sys_reset2(action, data);
> > > +
> > > if ((reboot_mode == REBOOT_WARM || reboot_mode == REBOOT_SOFT) &&
> > > psci_system_reset2_supported) {
> > > /*
> > > @@ -750,6 +780,68 @@ static const struct of_device_id psci_of_match[] __initconst = {
> > > {},
> > > };
> > >
> > > +static int __init psci_init_system_reset2_modes(void)
> > > +{
> > > + const size_t len = strlen(REBOOT_PREFIX);
> > > + struct psci_reset_param *param;
> > > + struct device_node *psci_np __free(device_node) = NULL;
> > > + struct device_node *np __free(device_node) = NULL;
> > > + struct property *prop;
> > > + size_t count = 0;
> > > + u32 magic[2];
> > > + int num;
> > > +
> > > + if (!psci_system_reset2_supported)
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > + psci_np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, psci_of_match);
> > > + if (!psci_np)
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > + np = of_find_node_by_name(psci_np, "reset-types");
> > > + if (!np)
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > + for_each_property_of_node(np, prop) {
> > > + if (strncmp(prop->name, REBOOT_PREFIX, len))
> > > + continue;
> > > + num = of_property_count_elems_of_size(np, prop->name, sizeof(magic[0]));
> >
> > Use of_property_count_u32_elems()?
> >
> > > + if (num != 1 && num != 2)
> > > + continue;
> > > +
> > > + count++;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + param = psci_reset_params = kcalloc(count, sizeof(*psci_reset_params), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + if (!psci_reset_params)
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > + for_each_property_of_node(np, prop) {
> > > + if (strncmp(prop->name, REBOOT_PREFIX, len))
> > > + continue;
> > > +
> > > + param->mode = kstrdup_const(prop->name + len, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + if (!param->mode)
> > > + continue;
> > > +
> > > + num = of_property_read_variable_u32_array(np, prop->name, magic, 1, 2);
> >
> > ARRAY_SIZE(magic)?
> >
> > > + if (num < 0) {
> >
> > Should this be less than 1?
> >
>
> of_property_read_variable_u32_array should return -EOVERFLOW (or maybe
> -ENODATA) if the array is empty. I don't see it's possible for
> of_property_read_variable_u32_array() to return a non-negative value
> that's not 1 or 2.
>
> > > + pr_warn("Failed to parse vendor reboot mode %s\n", param->mode);
> > > + kfree_const(param->mode);
> > > + continue;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /* Force reset type to be in vendor space */
> > > + param->reset_type = PSCI_1_1_RESET_TYPE_VENDOR_START | magic[0];
> > > + param->cookie = num == 2 ? magic[1] : 0;
> >
> > ARRAY_SIZE(magic)?
> >
> > > + param++;
> > > + num_psci_reset_params++;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists