[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA8EJpoFm8EjfBq70RTPtwR7Y7Rm24kHO20NukGiLGRYD0p9Tg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 16:18:45 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: neil.armstrong@...aro.org
Cc: Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@...cinc.com>, Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Connor Abbott <cwabbott0@...il.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/8] drm/msm: adreno: add GMU_BW_VOTE quirk
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 at 11:21, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 15/11/2024 08:07, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 04:48:28PM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> >> The Adreno GMU Management Unit (GNU) can also scale the DDR Bandwidth
> >> along the Frequency and Power Domain level, but by default we leave the
> >> OPP core vote for the interconnect ddr path.
> >>
> >> While scaling via the interconnect path was sufficient, newer GPUs
> >> like the A750 requires specific vote paremeters and bandwidth to
> >> achieve full functionality.
> >>
> >> Add a new Quirk enabling DDR Bandwidth vote via GMU.
> >
> > Please describe, why this is defined as a quirk rather than a proper
> > platform-level property. From my experience with 6xx and 7xx, all the
> > platforms need to send some kind of BW data to the GMU.
>
> Well APRIV, CACHED_COHERENT & PREEMPTION are HW features, why this can't be part of this ?
>
> Perhaps the "quirks" bitfield should be features instead ?
Sounds like that.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists