[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <njqf74avebb6fiestidmofxvse4j3ftux5j5tupolbayqpskl7@jlyxtubdj5x6>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 18:18:58 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Krishna Kurapati <quic_kriskura@...cinc.com>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, quic_ppratap@...cinc.com, quic_jackp@...cinc.com,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] arm64: dts: qcom: Add support for usb nodes on
QCS8300
On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 09:17:49PM +0530, Krishna Kurapati wrote:
>
>
> On 11/12/2024 4:34 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 11/5/24 17:49, Krishna Kurapati wrote:
> > > Add support for USB controllers on QCS8300. The second
> > > controller is only High Speed capable.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Krishna Kurapati <quic_kriskura@...cinc.com>
> > > ---
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > (the PHYs look good)
> >
> > > + usb_1: usb@...8800 {
> > > + compatible = "qcom,qcs8300-dwc3", "qcom,dwc3";
> > > + reg = <0x0 0x0a6f8800 0x0 0x400>;
> > > + #address-cells = <2>;
> > > + #size-cells = <2>;
> > > + ranges;
> >
> > Please match the property style with x1e80100.dtsi's dwc3 node
>
> Meaning adding the 3 properties to before the starting of dwc3 node ?
>
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > +
> > > + usb_2_dwc3: usb@...0000 {
> > > + compatible = "snps,dwc3";
> > > + reg = <0x0 0x0a400000 0x0 0xe000>;
> > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 442 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > > + iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x20 0x0>;
> > > + phys = <&usb_2_hsphy>;
> > > + phy-names = "usb2-phy";
> > > + snps,dis-u1-entry-quirk;
> > > + snps,dis-u2-entry-quirk;
> > > + snps,dis_u2_susphy_quirk;
> > > + snps,dis_u3_susphy_quirk;
> > > + snps,dis_enblslpm_quirk;
> >
> > maximum-speed = "high-speed"
>
> Ideally this is not needed for the driver to operate. Can I add this
> property when I send the patch to enable second controller on ride platform
> ? Only reason I ask is this is not a blocker and it would need another
> rebase.
I'd say, let's do it straight from the beginning.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists